Probably a nihilistic big bad hinted to back in Avengers. You know, the guy who's magic macguffin was just hanging around Asgard in their movie?

And what if the battle takes place in a Dungeon!? If the poor little Red Dragon can't take to the skies to avoid damage? What then, sir!?

I want to say something but it's pretty much impossible to comment on almost anything on this photo without spoiling it for someone.

You're not alone in that. I mean, they include the token 'We hurt Sharks more then they hurt us!' but come on, you can't undo 8 hours of gristly retellings of Shark attacks with that little bit at the end. Can we please focus a lliiiiiittle more on these animals and less on how they supposedly all want to kill us…

Elective amputation may be new, but the 'ethical conflict'—that being surgery for largely superficial or 'enhancement' reasons is in no way that novel. Breast augmentation, liposuction, botox injections, facial reconstruction. The list goes on and on. It's slightly 'unique' that some people may want to have an…

Jury's out on Cold Fusion? Uh, the jury came back to that one a couple times. Doesn't work. Zero positive data points. Pretty much any 'positive' was a result of very clear measurement errors. Last I checked, it's pretty firmly in the 'not gonna happen' camp for now.

Oh, you're right. a giant lizard with fiery atomic-laden breath instead of lasers. geeze, how could I make such an error? That is a totally plausible scientific thing that could happen and in no way fantastical or so detatched from reality that it could be found in god damn orbit. Truly it's a harrowingly realistic…

Uh, yes, I did see the original Godzilla film, both the original and the English version that added the 'American Journalist'. It was still pretty camp. It was a GIANT RADIOACTIVE LIZARD. And if memory serves, he still shot lasers in that film. HARDLY what I'd call 'grounded' and 'Nothing sci-fi about that!'

""There's nothing scifi about this movie. It's very grounded, very realistic."

Err, I thought Tiger Sharks were actually in third place. o.O Bull Sharks are actually the first.

Welllllllllllllll...

"well we're never really 100% of the evil Umbrella Corp's motivations any more."

The unmentioned rule 23 is to gut punch people with their own fleeting mortality so that an otherwise cheery kids movie inexplicably fills the theater with grown men and women bawling their eyes out.

The way it's explained, the men of the Night's Watch are not supposed to have any connection that might shift their loyalties away from their duty as a man of the Night's Watch. Once you join, you guard the wall and that's it. As you touched on though, it's a rule that's pretty much broken and looked the other way. …

Far more practical concern is cluttering up our atmosphere with various junk as we launch shuttles making future launches more and more dangerous and as they go on. I could be wrong, but some of the concern over increased space traffic causing ecological damage was analyzed back when they were consideirng those…

If I'm remembering the right show, this particular 'special' was devious in the way it screwed with people as well. There would often be someone standing in the background (say, behind the curtain) for like a split second on some shots throughout—but when they would reshow the clip (say, having the cast 'examine the…

I think it's precisely because it's an ensemble superhero film and that it essentially had to overcome massive hurdles to get here are why people's expectations run so high.

Well in this case it tastes like 'There are three writing credits on this movie and it was not directed by. In addition to Whedon himself had no direct involvement in the shooting process whatsoever.' but I guess that wouldn't make for such pith.

Sooooooo... what did the art book say about the movie reel?

If it turned out that his creation was George Washington or even Abraham Lincoln, I would give you all of my dollars to get this made.