Good one, man. I think you've made a lot of important and well thought out points about the importance of proper nicknaming. I just wanted to say I support your cause and I think you're doing brave, and ground braking work here. I look forward to raising my children in a world where people have good, reasonable…

These videos are always too flashy and vague. Just talking heads saying cliche stuff and no actual explanation about why these guys are good. I get that one guy practiced a lot and the other guy was more emotional. But breakdown a play. Let the guy explain what all that clicking and keyboarding is actually doing. Show…

That's a specific type of new-fangled Upworthy clickbait. The old "The Opposite of the Conventional Wisdom Is Actually True" format is classic, 2007 click bait. See also #slatepitches: http://www.mediaite.com/online/slates-…

Uninspired would be "Some thoughts on the Counter-Strike scandal". This is classic contrarianism-without-substance clickbait.

Hah. Walking simulator.

The fuck's a Persimmon Bread? Turkey Tacos, yo!

It worked. RoLo did not get an offensive rebound!

I'd love Rockstar to take another pass at LA Noire.

There are 4 players who can shoot threes wide open on the perimeter while everyone quintuple teams Robin Lopez who never touches the ball.

How do you leave Aaron Boone of that list when talking to a Red Sox fan?

They hype because hype is exciting. It's the same reason Meet The Press covers horse race nonsense instead of boring policy. And they hype because it's easy and requires no work. It produces content for not much labor. It's an inherent flaw of for-profit journalism.

Fanboy journalism breeding fanboy defenders. You just wrote 4 paragraphs in support a non-news story. You looked deep and hard into the journalistic ethics of this copy-paste rah-rah fluff piece and you are confused and perplexed and not really sure what the problem is. That's what having a nice clean, washed brain…

It's very carefully worded and has all the necessary caveats, sure. It's still barely more than a press release and a trailer with some giddy hype on top. The point of this article is to get people excited to buy a product before it's been released. This is textbook enthusiast journalism.

What?! The game is difficult on the highest difficulty settings? That's crazy.

Thank you for explaining what I said.

I never said anything about either of those games.

Change the name from Cosby to Rickles and this is totally acceptable behavior.

If this game ends up sucking and launches bug ridden and half-broken, will you change your editorial policies when it comes to the tone of headlines and articles based solely on trailers and press releases?

Seeing what? What have you seen?

What a second. I'm confused. I thought radical feminists and SJWs controlled what games got censored and what games were allowed through the power of hashtags and YouTube videos. Has my entire worldview been wrong this whole time?