Pat Metheny, one of the godfather's of smooth jazz, on Kenny G:

Pat Metheny on Kenny G:

Looks like it eluded you too this gen. All that's left is the crybabying.

But...you own a PS3, johnny whinypants.

Awww, this little guy doesn't want a bunch of stuff. Isn't that special.

Oh cool. Weird mouth with tongue and teeth and thick neck. Maybe when it shows up it'll be in chains and then it'll flex and spittle and break the chains and run after you and you'll have to dodge so it hits a wall or a pillar or something. That'd be cool and new and different and important. Can't wait to be pretend…

You're a good rape detective. Way to put the clues together!

Yeah, man! What if the rape is just a fake rape!

Great jobs explaining the flaws in a joke, guys! Are you available for parties?

What do you spend your time doing?

If Mouse Wheel's on there, "W" of WASD fame should be there too. That thing's a beast.

It's not a temper tantrum. It's a philosophical discussion with colorful language. Don't tell me to calm down just because you've got nothing interesting to say. Are you done being a boring scold? I already pointed out that irony you think you discovered up-thread. I'd quote myself again but I don't want to sound…

Capitalism is a con. Retail sales is a con. Convincing people to buy things they do not need is con-artistry. It's just a question of scale. If you reject that premise, I get it, but I'm not particularly fascinated by it and you can move on. Selling someone something they can't use and then having them feel good about…

Nice. "Brush up on your reading comprehension skills". Classic. That's a straight up Compuserve-burn. Send me a link to Webster's dictionary. I dare you.

I doubt Square had "the western media" (i.e. Fox News, etc.) in mind when the made the change. Think more "the western mom/grandma browsing the aisles at Target". It's a 3DS game. In Japan/Korea, everybody plays mobile games on the train. In the west, it's more likely to be just the kid in the back seat of the car.…

I mean if you think mistaking "entirely dependent on" for "equals sign" is 'deliberately misinterpreting my text' and is also "impolite and unconstructive, I don't know what to tell you.

Your second paragraph addresses what you said and what statements you made. It didn't address what I said. "Really?..." and bold italicized text were my indication that you are less than chillaxed. That's how someone who is incensed at the mere mention of a horse and/or a buggy sounds. Chillaxitude is not expressed…

It's also totally different from what you said and what I replied to.

It's pretty cut-and-dry censorship. It's not "Official Censorship", it's corporate censorship for marketing reasons, but it's still censorship. Putting a black bar over a mid-driff is the same as bleeping cuss words. You imposing your cultural values (modesty, seriousness, etc.) on top of the creators' (sexiness,…

Really? You are going to harp on one of three examples and ignore the other ones and then fail to actually address my question? How does it make sense to be distracted by buggies while ignoring my Kotaku/Game Informer, NYTimes.com/New York Times analogies.