Your comment started poorly.

This all falls under the "psyching your opponent out" rubric and each sport has to define it's own written and unwritten rules. David Stern fined Gregg Popovich for resting his starters in a Spurs-Heat regular season game. It was a legit strategy for the Spurs (to hedge against possible injury and keep his starters…

Taunting is a legitimate boxing strategy. You're trying to bait your opponent into jabbing so you can dodge and cross.

There's a place for play: it's called a living room or an arcade.

It's not our fault they decided to shove boobs and butts in our face. Kinda ridiculous to complain when all we want to talk about is boobs or butts. Especially those of us who only know the game through screenshots. I don't even have a Playstation. How's the sound and gameplay? Lemme guess: pretty good. Fascinating!

I don't know what you're referring to, but here are some quotes from Polygon's 6.5 review:

I'm insinuating that it is perfectly valid for a reviewer to bring their subjective opinions of a game's art style (i.e. "too brown", "too deriviative", or "too juvenile and sexist") to a review of a game. The objective review of the game would just refer to its price, length, file size and any other thing you can put…

Art style is a part of "the Game". If a game had shitty, repetitive music it should get docked for that.

Not exactly grafitti. Magical markings that relay messages from another dimension don't really count. We're looking for actual words written by NPCs.

Jet Grind Radio did it better.

I just replayed Mega Man 2 and it is still a total masterpiece.

It's your world, bruh.

Opinion Guy's got opinions, y'all!

You're splitting hairs. Things that require knowledge and time are "hard". Things ignorant people can do quickly are "easy".

Thanks, Johnny Milquetoast, for that update on the continuation of the status quo. Riveting.

The little poster isn't relevant? Is this your thread? Did you swap screen-names CAMN? This is a thread talking about a poster that someone posted in response to a video about people being jerks to geek girls. I'm pretty sure the entire poster was meant to be relevant. Homeboy could've cropped out the "men=women" bit…

I don't know why we needed to harsh the mellow of this little tune with a list of all the terrible qualities and personal defects that men and women sometimes share. Seems like a lame, round-about and overly negative way to get to a pretty banal gender equality message that doesn't really move the discussion forward…

Who got angry? Was it the video above? Or the jpeg that says women can be sexist pervert pig asshole deadbeat idiots? Who brought their anger into this discussion of an adorable song about women feeling good about themselves? How long do I need to live to understand what statement? Can you be more specific? Both on…

How "IS" that relevant to the video posted above? Please elaborate.

Cool story, bro.