I apologize for misenterpreting.

So is talking, but your position is apparently that I shouldn’t talk? Cool.

I don’t particularly care about Lena Dunham. And I know I’m not allowed to say this, but maybe this guy didn’t do this? Maybe he did, but also maybe he didn’t? If this guy is her friend, and she loves and supports him, and she believes that he’s innocent, shouldn’t she say so instead of releasing the unfortunately…

He tried though!

Everybody’s different, but I find that if I won’t admit to something that I did or said until the New York Times writes an article exposing my behavior, then I have gravely miscalculated.

But... why don’t these turtles have grotesque humanoid faces? What year is this?

I was inferring by my comment that it was awful regardless. Call it an outing, or call it just plain old behaving like a piece of shit, no one deserves either, especially from a boss or coworker.

So maybe it was just regular inappropriate workplace sexual harassment? This is a regular Rashomon situation here.

That is arguably the worst thing Brett Ratner has ever done.

I honestly thought similarly, then it was pointed out to me that he never apologized and yet still managed to talk about his dick twice.

Yeah, I remember that big controversial headline in The Post: “Harvey Weinstein Calls Woman Gorgeous”

I don’t know, maybe they did both and I’m just being an asshole. But, I still feel like there’s something unethical about crowdsourcing sexual assault accusations. Like, if I wrote an article asking for tips about whether anyone’s ever seen a unicorn, that’s one thing. If I wrote an article asking for evidence that…

Thank you, I genuinely appreciate this!

She’s the Earth Human whose name was featured prominently in the headline of the article you voluntarily opened on your electronic computing device so that you could snidely pretend to be burdened at the thought of having to use Google.

Correction: A previous version of this post said that The Washington Post broke the story, when in actuality it was The New York Times that broke the story. Ka Mai - New and Improved regrets the error.

I really hope Michael Bay had sex with a horse.

FWIW, although Louis CK would be rated TV-MA for sexual content, I meant to write sexual assault.

1,944 percent? Wouldn’t you just be a giant set of eyelashes with tiny dangling legs? Or am I just terrible at mathematical concepts?

OK, but if I was a journalist and I had a source who would not go on the record, I could write a story and report that Louis CK is guilty of sexual content based on my anonymous, confidential source, backing them up with my integrity as a reporter, with hopefully my news organization backing me up with their integrity…

what?