The most EPIC first world problem.

Still calling it a iPhone 4G huh.

I'd say Jeep Wrangler. Pretty forgiving.

You haven't seen many period pieces, have you.

You read it correctly, however - did you catch why it was put there in the first place?

There's plenty of other stuff than articles on the internet.

He's an idiot why exactly? Pointing out the facts? Let me guess, you bully the school children?

Wow.

Is our sun's light red? No. This doesn't apply to Earth. He's too powerful a character IMO, adding "magic" isn't changing this.

I reckon this shouldn't spoil it for them. They know what's up. It's just too big a pill for me to swallow.

Not sure if this is referring to new Star Trek movie which actually links up to originals but in itself created a new timeline thereby creating a new story line or something that's gone over my head completely.

I may catch some heat for this, but honestly I cannot get behind this character. I know he's loved by so many, and is one of the first if not THE first superhero character, but his current incarnation is just the dumbest thing I have ever encountered. Back in the 20s when he was created he could "leap tall buildings…

Because putting the same actor in the same roll in a different series is confusing to audiences. They needed to make it a point to say: this is a new Superman storyline.

Only the fat one.

Uh, dude. Seriously?!

I do believe this is the after credits scene for Capt. America...

Pretty concrete. But whats with the Michael Bay hating? There are movies you go to see to be moved, and engulfed, and then there are movies where you just want to see some hot women and explosions. This man rules the latter, and there's really nothing wrong with that. He's filling a niche.

True.

Blah, pass. I've seen the whole "humans are greedy and destroy everything they come in contact with" before. It's old.

Airplane mode please.