“I didn’t realise having my face eat off would hurt this bad!” says adult human who was *so* desperate for fame he voluntarily put his face into the mouth of a face eating leopard.
“I didn’t realise having my face eat off would hurt this bad!” says adult human who was *so* desperate for fame he voluntarily put his face into the mouth of a face eating leopard.
I had the same reaction to the Ghostbusters movie. I assumed that all the criticisms it got were from people who just couldn’t handle the all female crew. I wanted it to be good. Then I watched it and it was ... not. It certainly wasn’t as bad as the trolls were making out, it didn’t ruin my childhood, but it was not…
They make it sufficiently easy that mass killings are realistically possible. Without them it is very hard. Logically then, reducing the number of firearms will reduce the number of mass killings.
It more or less does though. A person can go on a rampage with a bladed (or blunt weapon) and, *maybe* kill 3 or 4 people - but cases of mass killings by a single person without using a firearm of some sort are *vanishingly* rare. The practicalities of it just don’t work - as soon as you start stabbing people and…
It simply isn’t true that for prison to be an effective deterrent, the conditions inside need to be harsh. What acts as a deterrent is the thought of being caught and having your freedom removed*. “White collar” criminals don’t commit their crimes because they think “Meh, prison isn’t so bad”. They commit these crimes…
You didn’t though. What you’re doing is the literal opposite of trying - you’re throwing your hands up and say “Oh well, it can’t be helped, we just have to put up with it”
Laws which prevent people who are inclined to “go postal” from having easy access to firearms. Like they have in all those countries in which mass shootings aren’t a near daily occurrence.
“Unborn human” would also refer to any human who didn’t exist, of which there are literally an infinite number - including every fictional (human) character that anyone has ever thought of.
Also crammed full of references to decades worth of mario games that every few seconds my son would lean over and whisper “That’s a reference to ....” in my ear.
“A derogatory term for South Asian people,”
Yes, it is definately a racist slur.
“Yet, none of this is particularly surprising. It’s the natural conclusion of stan culture, of intense parasocial relationships with celebrities”
I’m sure the legal team working for one of the parties involved in an acrimonious divorce would have no reason to lie or distort the truth.
All music criticism ever boils down down: You know those sounds you like listening to? Well, you’re doing it wrong.
I’m not the world biggest potato fan, but barf?
The day every single person who works for the Daily Mail dies in a fire, the world will become a better place.
Suffer? The women in question would be brain dead. They’re beyond suffering, by definition. You’ve not addressed that at all - unless you’ve explained how a dead person can suffer.
Which are all factors to consider when deciding whether or not to give consent to such a thing. If you decided to give consent for your organs to be used after your death, but then learned that your family was going to veto your decision because it would upset them - how would that make you feel? “It might make their…
Maybe you think you see frame dips where there are none.
The same way we can argue we’re not just a collection of organs, but we are when we’re dead (and have previously consented)