The headline is false though, so....?

Except both those papers only quote him as saying “It’s very alien to see this in Europe. We are all behind you,”.

Hyperbole much?

They’re still MPs, but they’re not part of the government.

Do what, exactly?

Moreover, the country in question is an ally of the US with which the US has a good diplomatic relationship.

It’s less than that. Putting up a lawn sign requires a modicum of effort (you have to get a sign, and you have to spend a few minutes outside putting it up), and your neighbours can see your sign.

It’s OK, it’s the UK government and thus Foreign and Quirky and not worthy of trying to understand.

How much have *you* spent in the last 12 months to watch women’s sporting events?

The whole article smacks of American parochialism.

Because obviously the Russian state - that just invaded another country - trembles in the face of a petition filled in by some foreigners who live in countries Russia hates.

There’s a definite feeling of “fuckit, that’ll do” about the examples. Like, the author got half an articles worth of actual reasonable examples then... just couldn’t be bothered with the rest.

Her mother, Rose McGowan, must be turning in her grave.

It’s not even cultural laziness.   If you know *nothing* about India you know it has, *at least* 100 people living there.    The chances of two randomly selected people being related just because they share a name is probably quite low.

Send her christmas cards addressed to Mrs John Smith

The length of sustained fire from that AA gun is what gives it away to me.

Even if it’s not legally binding, it’s still a reasonable position:   “We both promised we’d never X” is a reasonable objection to someone doing X.

It broke, so people stopped using it.

Check the spelling

He was their employee, working in their showroom when the scamming took place - they should bear at least some responsibility.