Eosa
Eosa
Eosa

Sounds like an underwhelming pile of meh.

these fords aren't welded aluminum, its riveted, I built the assembly line for these trucks. the heat from welding ruins the aluminum. Henrob makes the rivet guns for this

Is it just me that thinks this or have all of the Jalopnik writers turned into gigantic pansies? Don't eat the street fish. Don't drift on TV. Don't speed in Virginia. Don't buy that salvage title Audi. Don't murder people from Craigslist. Well you know what? You don't tell me what to do, I do what I want.

Oh well after washing and cooking it at over 100 degree temps, i guess it's pretty safe and is gonna taste the same anyway

You guys realize that fresh fish, before they are caught, were swimming in waters that other fish defecated in and birds shit on?!?!? Not to mention the pollution we dump in.

Fuck DeBlasio, he's the biggest communist asshole since Stalin.

Much strong. This panel is not that hard to fix.

Should've used the front. Might've improved it a good bit.

The viper was doomed to fail the day it came out. If you release a car that is slower than your main competitors old car how can you expect to gain customers. This speed the is strictly to that segment. It's like the Silverado. They released it to be on par with the out going Ram and F150. New F150 comes out and boom

I've had more than 20 years of winter weather driving under my belt, all of which is in a well-known (and ridiculed) area of the country, Western New York State. I can unequivocally state that your comment about rear-wheel drive being superior is complete, utter bullshit.

No it isn't. People that buy (or lease) brand new luxury cars buy them because they want the latest and greatest. They don't want to deal with repairs. If my MB has an issue, they trailer a fucking loaner to my house and swap it out until mine is ready. I don't drive it down to Honest Joe's Luxury Auto repair and

Wes is going off of "the weight transfer to the rear under acceleration." The problem with that statement in snow driving is that the weight transfer varies. If its really hard acceleration, then yes. But under slow acceleration, where you aren't mashing the pedal down, the weight transfer isn't so great. And in the

There's been quite a bit of AWD hate going around Jalopnik lately, but I don't think AWD is the issue. I think the issue is marketing and consumer ignorance. Given the same car with AWD vs. 2WD, same tires, same driver, the AWD car will outperform the 2wd car almost anytime. The issue is that people think it makes

Yes and no. My subaru is "good in the snow." When the snow gets real, even with all-seasons, I can go places in my subaru where my RWD vehicles (3-series, x-terra) with snow chains struggle - not that I would even attempt driving the 3-series when things are bad. I don't know what to say other than that subaru's

" If you're a real man and drive a car with a manual transmission, you'll just need to slip the clutch a little more as you do this. If you're a wuss, just put your automatic into "2," or push the snowflake button next to it, which does the same thing."

O'really? Take it from someone who's lived in both the desert (middle east) and currently in Sweden, AWD with proper tires will always be better than rwd or fwd.

I'd rather ride with a good driver, using all-seasons, who knows the limitations of their vehicle rather than a poor, inexperienced driver on winter tires. Skill trumps equipment every time, in my opinion.

That doesnt make sense. If the car isnt accelerating quickly, as likely may not be on snow or ice, the weight on the rear wheels, as affected by acceleration, would be negligible.

"Rear-Wheel Drive being a superior solution in almost all-circumstances, of course."

It's not that I don't take this one seriously, but it is amusing coming from a guy who lives in So.Cal and doesn't own a car.