Not just assholes, criminals. Now that this is out, I hope he goes to the effort to throw the book at them.
Not just assholes, criminals. Now that this is out, I hope he goes to the effort to throw the book at them.
"We were friends, and I was kind to all the girls, but everyone knew Miranda had problems," DeSando said. "She was adorable, but impossible to deal with."
Yes I have. I played with it to the point that I forgot what I had originally hit the website for. I love their interactive ones!
I have it on good authority that the answer is 42. It's the answer to everything really.
Hello psychic twin. Yes to everything you have listed. I also have the added protection of setting most everything people post and tag in facebook to be visible to 'only me.'
I wouldn't put it past them. They'll find some archaic law that would appear to apply to a pregnant woman fetish and double her sentence.
Elected is one thing. It's the 're-elected' part that really gets me.
In this article, it talks about how men are more likely to self-report rape if the word 'rape' is not used. Some of them see a no as something to push past, and once you get to that point it's 'fine' and really some people really need to be taught that that's not the case.
No pouches. Also her waist is thicker than her head, so not Liefeld.
I will forever love Colbert for this site: http://www.dayswithoutagoprapemention.com/
Depends on the situation. If it's a dinner, start on time, and take your time answering the door when they come in (if you know them well enough, toss in a "hey, you guys can just hang up your coats and join us. I have to run as I don't want my dinner to get cold"). If you're meeting somewhere to move on, just text…
I never underestimate the Republican party's abilities to make shit sandwiches from lemonade. It has been years of 'wait... what?' moments.
From what I've read, these two are the only ones who tossed out/tracked down addresses. That seems to be the line between 'fantasy' and 'action' used by law enforcement here.
Thanks! That's so good to hear. I'm most excited about the SAFER section. As well as the anti-trafficking.
Forgive my cynicism, but do the provisions in the bill include funding for all of the above? Because in the past when the Republicans lose a fight (and they appear to have put up much less of a fight than usual), they just financially starve the act in question, de facto having the same effect as having defeated the…
That may be true, but just because all apples are fruits doesn't mean all fruits are apple.
Well thank you for that sobering thought.
My one concern though is what else is in there. Assuming that it's horse fit for human consumption, it doesn't bother me at all. However, if they're willing to sell x and call it y, what else have they shoved in there?
This has been happening all over. It's the calm before the storm (For definition of 'storm' see the Jalopnik 'new and improved' layout).
They knew how it worked in theory and in animals. They tested it on men for side effects, etc. But they didn't know the level of efficacy of everything in human females until after it was released to market making for a larger and untracked sample group. Yeah, that made sense according to them.