El_Furioso
El_Furioso
El_Furioso

I'm still sticking with Alcatraz for now, but it needs to be kicked in the butt a little and get to the "What the hell is going on?" part of the plot very soon. They tease us with the weird "locked door with streaming light" shot, then completely ignore it. I can watch procedural police dramas on pretty much any other

Too much fun. Reminds me of music school in the late '80s with the Mini Moog and ARP. Fond, patch-cabled memories.

For all of us "four eyes" out there, we might be out of luck. Guess it's time to finally give contacts a try...

Not even a mention of Snapz Pro X, the grandfather of Mac screen capture?

My only MacWorld was 1995, and it was fantastic. The entire Moscone Center was alive and buzzing. Quark had this amazing-looking new multimedia app to compete with Macromedia Director (Immedia, LOL!), and we came home with a 12x12 Wacom tablet and two Clarus "Moof!" hats. Still have the hats. We stayed at a

It might indeed make you throw up, but don't presume we'd all react the same way you would.

Aw, give her a break. No qualified counselor knows the difference between a cosmic string and a quantum filament.

Very fun. But for how it's billed, definitely not enough dog-level footage. Those were the parts I enjoyed the most, and was hoping for more of that.

Doctor Strange: "Once all that is in place, casting will reportedly begin for the main character, with production planned to begin later this year."

Something makes me think I could fry an egg on this thing when I'm not using it to recharge my googaws.

Actually, given that this is Jan Brewer, it's more like this.

Now playing

From beyond the grave, Mr. Montalban approves of this presentation.

Why I'm not sure I'd want to add this to my already-too-unwieldy keyring, it'd be a good thing to toss into your emergency preparedness kit.

Would that Gilbert Gottfried-ed?

Very sorry I missed the window for this one. :(

I understood exactly what the author was talking about. Thanks! :)

Keep in mind that the resolution embedded in the image file (260PPI vs. 300PPI) has no bearing on how the image is programatically displayed. It's only the dimensions (64x64 vs. 32x32) that affect the size.

When you visited those sites, yes.

Please, just no.

Is the *entire* show shot as found footage? Premise seems interesting so far, but I don't think I could do an entire season of shakycam.