The judges have made their decision. They were looking for Style, Control, Damage and Aggresion.

With the advent of the Porsche, Ferrari and Mclaren hypercars, I'm not even angry about hybrids anymore. If they put a Fisker type drivetrain in, even better. If you're going to do hybrid, at least do it right.

The guys investing in the future. There's no doubt he's secretly evil and will soon be constructing a Death Star powered entirely by electricity rather than the thunderous V8 used by previous death stars.

That ones functional. Most Newage Impreza's don't have a rear wiper, and that spoiler drags air across the rear window to keep rear visibility up in the wet.

Took the words right out of my mouth.

But that's not all. While 4WD and snow tires can lead to overconfidence when the blizzards of a frozen hellish wasteland have descended upon your little New England/Minnesota/New Jersey/Miami town because global warming, they can also undoubtedly lead to massive amounts of fun given a big enough field and a heavy…

Agreed. The point of the Quattro was Rally-spec. Yes, Group B meant stupid power, but that power has no relevance today with 5-600bhp estates. May as well go for as near as possible to the original and make the thing drive like Harris wished the MX-5 did :P

FYI, self levelling is to do with front-rear suspension levels. If the boot is loaded, the rear of the car dips, pushing the light beam up. This is what 'self-levelling' combats. Not driving up and down hills.

I'm just going to call this manufactured controversy what it really is: unfathomably stupid. So what if Hamilton posted some photos from a ski trip, and one he probably had planned for a while? It's not like he tweeted them out with the message "I went skiing and didn't put myself in a coma because I'm BETTER THAN…

Basically, HIDs are no longer a problem. LED and Laser are the ones you need to watch out for! :P

#COTD And true. Was 3 when I helped replace my dad's SD1 engine. Ahh, memories.

Not sure on US law, but in the UK, the priority is on overtaking, as opposed to the speed at which you're travelling to do so. Think of it this way: Mirror -> Signal -> foot down -> overtake as quickly as possible -> pull back in to 'slow' lane. You shoudn't inconvenience any following cars in this maneuver, otherwise…

Lane 1, presuming the 'slow' lane. Highly doubtful we'll come across each other, bearing in mind it seems fairly likely we have an ocean between us, but my points remain: Putting your Rear fog on to 'deter' tailgaters is a dick move, and only serves to make the road more dangerous than it already is with said…

See: This is the first excusable reason to use a fog all the time. Having been in a mini at 70 as a passenger, I can understand your attitude, which, bearing in mind my above reply, may seem inconceivable to some.

Whereas I would be the one to sit on your bumper with every available light on the front of my car ablaze. If you are in the correct lane, tailgating shouldn't be a problem, since the other car will be able to overtake in the next lane, regardless of relative speeds. Let me make this clear: 2 illegal moves do not…

Now, this is a good idea. But I mean driving on the road with them on. reversing I see the point for sure.

One of those rare moments on NPOCP that I didn't even read the text. Its a vette. T-top, for under $10k. While not used to US currency, thats a bargain in any language, even if the engine needed work (just put an LS engine in).

The fog light button looks confusing enough, but drivers in Europe have to worry about the one in the rear as well.

And I completely respect you for having that opinion and allowing me to have mine. Thank you.

Thats actually an interesting prospect. Although I would presume that is repels bug in the same way ultrasonic emitters repel cats. They don't even think about being near to it. Could be wrong though lol