It’s the physics of supersonic flight that kill SSTs from a costing perspective.

Well, more a straight pull bolt action, but same idea.

But it’s not. Loosely holding a rifle, or looping it in your belt loop, is 100% the same as a bump action stock.

It’s not the freaking ATFs job. This is a legislative hole, not an issue with the ATF not doing their job.

For lay purposes a DA revolver is semi-automatic. One trigger pull = one shot without other manipulation.

Because it doesn’t break any legislation and the ATF can’t just deem something illegal.

Most shooters could do that with even 10 rounds magazines.

You own a hunting rifle. I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that you have decent shooting experience.

Are we going to ban Jerry Miculek then?

Can I get a cannon? And perhaps a warship?

You feel that bump fire stocks were close enough to existing legislation the feds could have restricted them?

You bring up a good point. The political win of banning bump fire stocks, is far larger than any public safety benefit.

You’d have to engineer in like roller blocks, or some other odd electrical or mechanical delay mechanism. It would be nearly impossible to retrofit existing guns and push prices sky high on new guns.

That law you have literally exists. Guns with bullet cranks, bump fire stocks, or similar devices absolutely only fire one projectile per trigger pull.

As a shooter though, do you really feel that the bump fire stock is any more effective than aimed fire while pulling the trigger rapidly?

That depends on your city.

I’ve done a 6x on New Years Eve. My alternative was waiting in -15 weather for 45 minutes for a taxi.

My longest Uber ride was 70 miles. I asked first and the driver was totally cool with it.

To clarify further:

I’m beginning to believe they stopped keeping small boxes to simplify their box logistics.