There is good reason to keep the details of the investigation away from the general public, but you are right, they are obligated to discuss their findings with the Complainant prior to reaching a determination, to get any additional evidence, or ask about any other resolutions that they might be able to work out.…

Yeah, that is the rub in those situations with only a victim and perpetrator, you just have he said she said. Few administrative policies or laws for that matter, have a way of dealing with that. Suggestions Internet?

Well that is straight up retaliation. Time for a lawsuit!

AAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MUST PUNCH SOMETHING!

Excellent point. Or at least have designated people of both genders that can properly get the ball rolling.

Technically it would be a violation of Title VII of the civil Rights Act of 1964, but your point is valid. Full disclosure: I am a white male in civil rights compliance. At our state schools, the Title IX coordinator is also the Equal Opportunity and Disability Compliance coordinator. The person is basically supposed…

Settle For!!! Dude that would be the ideal!

You know, I have been thinking that the whole sterility arc with Black Widow would not have been necessary at all if there had been a Black Widow movie the year before that explored her history more. I mean what the hell? At the end of Winter Soldier we see that Romanoff has revealed all her secrets and has to go…

How does JetBlue do it?

Good point, the next time I have a delayed flight I will think to myself, Damn this airline needs to start handing out concussions, that will fix this problem.

But we know his behavior. He basically said no. A few times. Considering the circumstances, that is reasonable. If he had struck someone maybe. But in his position, where I am being asked to solve a problem the airline created while needing to be at work the next morning, Saying no is a reasonable response. His only…

Because my employer buys licenses in bulk for thousands of employees. And constantly converting from another app would be annoying.

How relevant is any of that to the events at hand? Did united know his history? Did the cops? Because he is a bad guy should we pretend that its only fair that this happened?

No incentive? Not even the incentive to maintain a good company image. What about the basic human incentive to be fair to other human beings?

Those may be the rules, but the rules suck. If you as an airline are going to take the risk of overbooking flights for the extra cash, then you should prepare to pay what the customer demand. If it becomes too costly, then maybe that whole overbooking thing was as stupid as it sounded.

I have seen this asked a lot. Have they answered it at all?

Um, Wasn’t the passenger a doctor who had to be at work in the morning? United does not HAVE to overbook the flight, they just do to get more money. When they have too many people, no passenger should ever be obligated to leave. If they cannot pay the customers not to do it, then they have to keep raising the price.…

Season 1 was about breaking the brother out of prison

Okay my wife and I are both bilingual (spanish-English) and I get how it can be off putting if we suddenly switch between them (usually unconsciously) But if your wife is speaking in Spanish to someone else who understands Spanish in your presence. You are an asshole for making a big deal about it. Either learn the…

shouldn’t that be “incubus”?