DrSensible2345
DrSensible
DrSensible2345

Can we also please fix the money issue in the game? Sometimes I've accidentally blown up a friends vehicle and I want to pay the claim for them, or we've robbed an armored car and I picked up all the money I need to be able to give it to those who helped (Apparently it does not count as a "job" in online).

Yeah, my friends and I typically just set up a little world of our own to play in. We don't have to deal with the "Unknown Element" of other players, so it may diminish the experience a bit, but with the penalty for dying so high before it wasn't worth the money.

Completely understandable rant, and I totally agree with you. I also agree that the first few seasons of Smallville were excellent for what they did with Clark Kent. So when the movie can't establish this character that the WB spent way too long milking, I have a problem. I don't get or like the idea of Superman

Well, let me explain it to you then:

Yeah, the cartoon was not the best in terms of acting and story. Know what else was in the 80s? Everything. Everything sucked in the 80s, especially cartoons. They were, however, better than the other crap that was on at that time.

So, when we have a bunch of really good stories.

C'mon... anybody can make stuff look shiny, but you couldn't tell what was going on in that movie! Maybe you're right, and it was just move terrible direction and editing, but I was not impressed.

Well, I disagree with you. All of the Transformers movies by Michael Bay have been terrible. Bad acting, bad stories, bad graphics... you name it, it was bad. Hopefully I can watch a good Transformers movie in 20 years during a new reboot cycle.

Close. I was more referring to the fact that the "Clark Kent" in Smallville was a closer representation of Superman than that of the Man of Steel movie. (Justopolls claimed that Man of Steel was the best version Superman on film).

But yeah... Smallville was a ton better too. In the way that you mean. Man of Steel

Would have been more appropriate if they ended the video with Superman snapping a neck.

Movie film? Like... live action? I would say that it is questionable (the name "Man of Steel" seems appropriate because what I watched was not Superman).

Superman for the television far surpasses Man of Steel, whether it be Superman from the DCAU or Smallville, it was much better than the trash I saw in the movie

I'm confused at why you're confused. Of course how extreme it is directly correlates with whether or not it should be considered abuse. The difference between me flicking you with a finger or punching you in the face is the difference between it being considered assault. You're not abusing the child. You're using

I would say it's a good point except for the fact that all the Wolverine movies are terrible. Wolverine is an interesting side character, but once he's thrown into the mix on his own all of those traits you find so admirable have to be thrown to the sideline so they can progress the story. If you're judging the

Don't get me wrong, if Rockstar used his work without his permission Rockstar should pay a fair fee to him. However, I always side with the big corporation in situations like this for two reasons:

1) Most big companies hate litigation, so they go the extra mile to make sure that everything is above board legally.

I would certainly argue with the comparison of a vehicle of substance in the real world than a vehicle in a video game. I don't see how this is any different from anyone losing progress from a corrupted save file, or any other very common programming glitch we all experience as gamers. Also, since this is a free

I've heard of everybody on your list except Daz Dillinger. Maybe he needs a little bit more exposure...

While I agree that Rockstar should be paying people for their property, I've got two problems with this story:

1) It's not like Rockstar got the worlds best music in the game (opinion). There are some good songs, but Rockstar probably could have gotten a ton of really great music in their game for close to free, so I

Yep, I totally agree. Something to do with the mouth and cheeks, and how they are proportioned, I believe. Instantly knew they were both CG, but they're very good in any case.

Read the whole exchange and you, sir, are a joke. While RicemanFTW is attempting to bring up points, you have brought up nothing but a childish "Na Uh!" and then accuse him of trolling. You are scum, and apparently the worst kind there is. BasketBallBooblesBBB and Starmember are having an actual discussion with the

A very reasonable and well stated comment. Though I disagree with you in your final statement still about the comparison between losing game time from one game or the other (since you can play the online mode by yourself or trusted friends without being mass killed - which only happens occasionally to me), I still

A very well structured bit of literature. Complete nonsense, but it was properly written so bonus points to you (I'm being 100% serious, too often people resort to cursing and misspelling, so I want to thank you for writing well).

First off, comparing two definitions and correlating them? I mean, maybe it would work

So, you're saying that instances of actual "victims" of "beatings" from their parents don't count for anything? We have people testifying that the spankings (not beatings, you moron) work and cause no psychological issues, and your argument is that even the fact that they can believe something like that proves that