DrSensible2345
DrSensible
DrSensible2345

To clarify, my good sir, I do not blindly listen to propaganda and accept it as truth.

I don't think that accepting everyone is cynical, though your comment about "acceptance is recognizing who a person is, and not judging them for it" seems contrary to your comments about those who hate.

If you continue to antagonize and hate people who are on the other side of an argument than you, you will never be

Hi Aryn! Just wanted to politely disagree with you! While the effectiveness of the "War on Drugs" may be in dispute, I certainly do not want to have society stop condemning people for the use of drugs. I believe that we should be doing all that we can to prevent the sale and use of the stuff, for the simple reason

You do realize that accepting people is accepting them despite their faults. So long as no one who identifies as homophobic (a ridiculous term since fear is not their primary motivator) doesn't raise a hand to anyone who identifies as homosexual for that explicit reason, I've got no problem with them.

The fact that

Hey Kiddo! I'm a Microsoft fanboy and I 100% agree with you. Never bought a PS3 (had the PS2 and PS1) but was in sloppy gross love with the 360.

I was horrified when the X1 specs were dropped, and cheered audibly when Sony went the other route. I'm not getting either at this point (waiting for reviews after they

Just reading your comments you sound like a thoroughly unpleasant individual. I dislike digital and will not purchase any system that forces it on me as my only source.

Yeah, but I make a disc copy of my music just in case. Oh, and I can copy it and give it to my friends. I don't think we're going to have that type o' freedom with a DRM1

I suppose if you can't make a legitimate argument, attacking the other person would be your last resort.

Yes, you did, and none of what you said is correct.

I suppose that getting resources, securing areas for the advancement of your people/society, and protecting yourselves from aggressors are all generalizations for war as well?

Oh, and your homophobic=asshole just shows the complete lack of knowledge and

I don't know if you were being ironic, but you made a sweeping generalization about sweeping generalizations...

I now completely understand why you were confused, because you don't seem to read things very well. Let me break it down for you as simply as I can, and I'll do it in tidbits that might be easier for you to swallow.

1. You replied to me that you didn't call anyone stupid, even though I never said you did. Therefore,

Well, to use your own argument, I didn't say that you were calling anyone stupid.

What you did say, was that people were confused. Now, while I will 100% back you that Microsoft did not release a ton of information that would have cleared stuff up on Day 1 of E3, the one thing we understood very clearly was that the

My point was not so much about whether I "liked" the game, but it's relative popularity.

There are many games on Xbox that I would say are more popular than a WWE game, which is probably going to be purchased by it's fan base rather quickly.

If your point was on a more popular game that was released around the same

No student should be getting paid off of playing sports.

The benefits are thus:
They might get a scholarship out of the deal
They get a chance at some local fame
They have a chance to showcase skills for a potential high paying career with the NFL

Nobody is forcing the kids into playing football, they're doing it for all

I see your point, but I don't think that using WWE for your argument is going to sway many people...

Boy, is my face red!

You mean I could have played the games I purchased offline without an internet connection after 24 hours of being disconnected? Whoa, was I misinformed!

Now that you cleared up the fact that I can play the games when I want without getting shut out because I didn't check in, I totally want a turn

Thank you KalnReborn. It is completely insulting and disingenuous to claim that people were confused or that "Microsoft just needed to explain it better".

Yeah, I'm sure it was a huge surprise at Microsoft when they heard about the backlash for always online gaming. If only they had one of their employees post on twitter that "They don't know what the big deal is for always online" and "Why would you live in a place without solid internet" a SEVERAL months before E3,

Yeah, It had nothing to do with it being Microsoft. I like gaming on consoles. Consoles need electricity and a TV to play games. That is always the way it has been with consoles.

The moment that they required that I had to connect to the internet to play a game, I was done with them. That was a ridiculous