Now that’s the PR bullshit part of the statement. In reality, the people that were pro-crossplay within Sony just convinced the people that were not.

They will allow cross-play in other third party games. They said as much. They’re just starting with Fortnite.

No, it’s not. You read that into it.

Eh, not really. If they made it this far, they could’ve just kept going. Fortnite has already peaked in popularity, yet Sony survived with their previous stance. The reality is that the forces within Sony management that wanted to allow cross-play finally convinced the forces within Sony management that wanted to keep…

Yeah, no problem. Good luck!

Sony paid to keep the greatest Final Fantasy of all exclusive.

This is an odd nonsense-comment.

As I said in my reply to the OP, this isn’t artificial scarcity, and it isn’t Sony’s fault that they aren’t producing enough PS4 Pros. There is a massive capacitor shortage going on right now that is dramatically limiting Sony’s ability to produce enough PS4 Pros to meet demand. We haven’t seen this kind of capacitor…

This is absolutely not Sony practicing Nintendo’s favorite strategy (artificial scarcity). There is a massive capacitor shortage (a specific component within the PS4 Pro) the likes of which we haven’t seen since about 2008 which is heavily affecting PS4 Pro production. Trust me, Sony wishes they could be filling…

Dude, it’s not really “system warring” to say that the Switch has much weaker hardware than its competition.

Nope. Only console it was ever announced for was the PS4.

I am primarily concerned with fashion (though, I run as well.)

But they’re Asics :’(

Perhaps my favorite part of this whole design is how the DualShock light bar adds a splash of Spider-Man blue to the controller.

Yep. Probably a good call.

Yep. Probably a good call.

Not Bloodborne. That’s a Sony title.

When someone tries to explain how they’ve changed and are a much less shitty person now, I usually don’t try to rub in their face how they used to be shitty.

Hahahahahaha. Yep, keep it up; that’s a good argumentative strategy.

Notice how none of what you just wrote addressed this:

The length of time since it happened is not causation for a lack of evidence. The amount of evidence available has no bearing on whether the statute of limitations applies. There could be video evidence and a confession of a crime and it wouldn’t matter if the statute of limitations had already passed, so you’re…