DisgruntledPiglet
DisgruntledPiglet
DisgruntledPiglet

Your line about it being antithetical intrigued me.

I'm always puzzled by people who think rich guys don't 'need' to rape, you know? Sports stars especially. I think they're so spoiled that they probably never hear the word no at all.

It needs to be fought, unapologetically, I know that much. It's the worst kind of injustice, where the rapist is regarded as being the victim, while the victim is regarded as the true bad person. Talk to somebody about rape, and you know what they really think about women.

Well said.

Oh awesome. I love this answer. It's short and it makes perfect sense. I don't think there's anything I could add or subtract from this.

Actually, that would be based on a MISREADING of my comment, little boy. I never said a goddamn thing about no man ever being raped, robbed or murdered. I said that living in fear of the opposite sex (or being told to) is far more a fact of life for women than for men, because that is a fucking fact. And speaking of

Ok, who else IMMEDIATELY thought that this guy should be referred to as "the Mal Brough Man?"

I CANNOT RESIST THE SIREN CALL OF PUNNERY.

It's a news service with an exclamation point in its name. We should be grateful they even understand the concept of foreign countries.

This piece was incredibly brave and moving, but I really wish that, in addition to mentioning the prohibitive cost of the screening, she had explained that that cost was the result of a pharmaceutical company having patented the BRAC1 gene, and suing other institutions developing cheaper and more effective tests. The