Okay, but both parties have kind have been okay with those things historically. A democrat ignored the holocaust until Pearl Harbor happened and then a democrat order the use of the only atomic weapons used in a war. And it’s not about being polite, it’s about using your energy productively.

You are advocating using hate to combat hate. By that logic, the answer to there being too many guns, should be more guns. It’s bad logic. I’m not saying you should ignore hate and ignorance, but a better approach would be educating the ignorant and working against hateful acts. You should be angry about…

...is what you settled on after writing a 3 page paper refuting what I said in my initial post. Thanks for playin’.

For any reason?

What an insightful critique.

Did you enjoy that rage dump?

Exactly.

Not really what I was going for, but I’ll take it.

I’m pretty sure I didn’t say anything inflammatory, and I didn’t make anyone react to anything. A lot of people inferred a lot of things that I simply didn’t say, so I tried to correct them. But you can take it however you want. It was really just a philosophical discussion that some people got a little too heated…

I didn’t say it didn’t, but you saw someone talking about liberals and automatically got defensive.

It’s funny how liberals don’t understand that their hate fuels hateful and dangerous people and makes them more powerful. This Milo asshole rose to fame not because he is a uniting hateful asshole, but because liberals bitched about him so much that it made him famous. He is more a product of liberal hate than…

I wasn’t going to comment on this anymore, but you are 100% correct. I’m not saying that they aren’t dangerous people, but they live off of other people’s hate and it makes them more powerful and more dangerous. At least a few people get it.

I’m surprised no one has said anything about how this is a lecture about not lecturing other people. Clamp down on whatever part you disagree with though. That’s healthy.

He is an asshole. There is no arguing that. But do you think he cares if you hate him, or most of America hates him? It’s energy wasted. It’s even more wasted because he is a troll who wants to be hated. I wasn’t defending him.

And see, It’s fine for you to feel that way and disagree with my stance. I don’t think any less of you for it. My personal philosophy doesn’t have to affect you at all.

You’d be wrong. But I thank you for actually having something to say. It seems a lot less lazy.

Tolerance isn’t a good thing. You tolerate things you don’t like. Acceptance is a good thing. If you can accept that people are not always going to see eye to eye on everything, you can oppose them in legal, non-violent, non-hateful ways, but still know that they are people too and deserve consideration.

The point is, hate whoever you want for whatever reason you want as long as you don’t do anything to affect the people you hate. If you can manage it, you should strive not to hate anyone.

All of the things you mention should be met with resistance, but not hate.

How wonderful, you made a complete sentence. It lacks any real substance, but keep trying.