This article doesn't really phase me at all. Can anyone help me understand why?

I think the circumstances of her child's death are implied, regardless of what term they used to describe it. Also, placing both facts in the same sentence doesn't inherently equate them emotional impact each has. So again, can you explain why you feel the author is implying this?

I'm curious why you think they're equating these two things. Can you explain that?

Why are you angry?

This comment section is why I hate people.

I just moved to Phoenix. Aside from everyone having greasy hair it actually seems nice.

So close....

Bro, just admit to being a Pats fan already. If you want people to look at this objectively then some full disclosure is in order.

You tell 'em, bro.

What about the other ball? Or the 12 Colts balls? Why weren't they deflated? They were in the same environment.

Of all things to reference....

Nah, he's just not wearing pants.

K. Thanks.

srsly! wtf!

Clarify please: is this a joke about your racist grandma or a reference to what she cooked for the holidays?

I'm still going to assume this is a Jimmy Kimmel prank until further notice.

If so his office is full of assholes anyway.

Uh, the Padres gave up several of their top prospects. But yes, the pitching is still intact.

It's still difficult to comprehend given the similar color schemes of the Giants and Cowboys.

So the Paralympic mascot is a vegetable?