Did_it_for_the_Alliance
Did_it_for_the_Alliance
Did_it_for_the_Alliance

It’s unfortunate, but UM and UIM coverage are separate from collision/BI in the US. What will really floor you is the fact that “insurance” only refers to collision coverage, separate from injury coverage. Most states do mandate either $10k PIP, UM, or BI coverage in every policy, but even then, it’s only $10,000 in

That’s not entirely relevant here. I think the proposed law goes too far, but phone records can currently be easily subpoenaed in suits.

You can do it, but it’s about as illegal as driving with a suspended license (fairly). People are often irresponsible. Get UM coverage to protect yourself.

I see. I’ll probably skip it then.

Is it any different than the OVAs?

Mayoiga, Concrete Revolutio, Re: Zero, Tanaka-kun and Kiznaiver are also pretty different. Seven not-as-generic shows in a season is an improvement.

The first main joke/punchline killed it. I don’t think I’ve laughed that hard watching anime since Saint Oniisan.

Eh. Doesn’t seem to extravagant to me.

They actually do. That sort of things happens all the time, though to a lesser degree. Injury claims of passengers are always filed against the at-fault driver’s policy (obviously Rodas, since it was a one car), and, if the coverage is insufficient, against the person’s assets. In most cases, people have negligible

That’s what I also looked at, and Lee definitely has a sidewalk in that area.

I think the confusion stems from the author of the MLive article. Now there’s another MLive article from the same author that says Rickett instead of Lee, and Rickett does have a sidewalk for a stretch by Mission. I think someone needs to request the police report. That county unfortunately does not have reports

Pretty much. It’s an odd thing to made a stand over.

That’s the side street she turned onto. The MLive article says she was running on Lee Road when the cop first approached her, which does have a sidewalk.

Yeah, it’s pretty heartless work. I understand defending against frivolous claims, but when it’s something as obvious as permanent injury (though “permanent” is something people love to debate), it should be a much more streamlined process.

In that case, it was great. Insurance companies try to find ways to weasel out of honoring their contracts with the average person all the time. We made sure they don’t do that. You haven’t seen victim-blaming until you deal with insurance companies.

Since you seem to support multi-billion collar insurance companies screwing over the little guy, I’ll take that as a complement.

The statute currently says it’s not, but you can attempt to interpret it however you want.

I get what you’re saying, but this is a different situation.