According to the manufacturer’s website, they start at “1754000 rubles”, which translates to $26,610.

So I guess we’re going to have to add Foxtrot Alpha to Lanesplitter under the heading “brilliant pages Gawker killed.”

looks like an ISIS shopping list

As much as I love Jalopnik, you can’t seriously be considering continuing FTA without Tyler’s analysis? There are only so many ‘shocking drone videos’ we can take or ‘this one trick that makes ISIS mad’ posts.

We understand you want to promote your sh... site or whatever overlapping any Tyler’s article with more and more of unneeded info. A few points about that:

Jerry, buddy, I appreciate the kind words, but this is getting a little ridiculous now. Every single post you are hitting it with a ton of plugs, it is a bit distracting.

I am sure they did not use feet and inches in the engineering proces of this masterpiece.

That’s my gun!!! Seriously, I was the OPS/CSO on GTN when we installed the Block 1B mounts she currently has. I was really proud of the work my Sailors put in on getting it installed, calibrated, and getting rounds down range. It was probably the smoothest thing on that entire tour.

Likewise. And the commenters on those stories— it’s like a magnet for the self-righteous, judgmental, downright hateful, and the hyperbolic know-nothing club.

The most amusing part of that is that the burning plywood obstructs the cameras for the controllers and the RC tank goes skittering sideways and loses control (closely watch the video).

When I shop for unmanned armored vehicles - the ability to smash through 1/4 inch plywood walls and flaming grass piles is my #1 make-it-or-break-it criteria.

“

It’s a fundamental choice: do we want to continue providing CAS operations to Afghan forces to boost their force multiplication abilities at our own expense (procurement, operational wear-and-tear, fuel, pilot expenses, munition costs, etc).

Your first paragraph makes no sense.

Okay, so you want to bring in a political opinion in here. Fine. But let’s get this out of the way. Carter served in the U.S. Navy from 1946 to 1953 stateside and aboard several ships, including the U.S.S. Pomfret, a diesel-electric submarine. To say that he wasn’t a “warrior” takes a narrow minded view of what…

Carter applied for service under Rickover, but was instead assigned to US Atomic Energy Commission and Naval Reactors Branch. So I’m wrong

I’m sure there’s some truth to that, but there are more obvious reasons. Jimmy Carter was a submariner himself who served under the father of the modern Nuclear Navy, Hyman Rickover.

Useful idiot alert. Actually YOU'RE the "problem", as you think you have all the answers but they're all 100% backwards.