I care about the environment but you're right, this article and the guy it quotes are making themselves look ridiculous.

Oh fucking get over it guys. You're acting like fools and making yourselves look bad.

The entire point in the first place is that you shouldn't care that much. I wasn't backing out, I was repeating the point! God you're thick... you've somehow missed the entire meaning of the thread.

But I don't understand how this finding would support that conclusion, rather than its opposite. A universal utterance is surely, if anything, evidence for inherent aspects of language; in no circumstance evidence against it.

"With an attitude like that, why are you on Kotaku?"

I didn't understand at all how the universality of 'huh' as an expression of bemusement was supposed to discredit inborn grammar theories.

And the difference between a word and a vocalisation with meaning isss?

Your dogs speak?

A lot.

It's not of serious consequence to humanity. Throwing a little paddy and insisting that it really really is... is making you look like an idiot. It really... really... isn't. It's of very little consequence, and these console manufacturers are neither Hitler nor Mother Teresa. They're just making gaming machines. For g…

Yet another dishonest headline. Unless I'm being an idiot, I can't see "a stream of water actually juggling two balls" anywhere in the video. The closest it comes is when it supports a new ball but drops the old one... which isn't close at all.

Technically they provided a consistent definition within the first few seconds of the video. You didn't actually watch it..?

Haha... yeah, the hypocrisy is amazing. Do they even realise they're doing it?

Sure, interference is a classical phenomenon... but in the context of an article on quantum mechanics, you can assume it's a visual representation of the fact that interference also occurs for single particles, which is classic quantum physics, no?

Are you serious? Anybody who tells you that this trivial bullshit is not worth getting upset about must be "trolling" and is juat attempting to deflect from your important argument? Christ... you're far gone, mate.

Depends how you define 'important'.

Haha. No, I don't. That's the point. I don't care. Nobody with a life cares. Go do something productive, because whatever your comment was about, it was painful to read. This shit isn't important.

chuckle

I don't have a clue what you're talking about but it seems to be some kind of trivial, petty whine about some lame argument.

Come on dude, your noodle is built for abstraction. Use it.