OK, this guy has only appeared on my radar today and for this reason, but the two things aren't that hard to reconcile. I bet he was thrilled with the opportunity to be the sole voice in his son's education, and to shield him for the lesser material people "down the hall" might have wanted to teach.

This is a video which aims to satirize the dialogue around rape and move the conversation in a more productive direction. To say that people who could be triggered should take the topic, title or description as warning enough is to effectively keep them out of the conversation. I completely agree about movies, but I…

I guest "How Not to be Murdered by Your Abusive SPouse" was not a zingy enough title, so they changed it at the last minute.

That's it'? You're going to ignore the two paragraphs and focus on a single, easily understood typo? I mean, at least admit you realize you have no case here.
The woman can't even take a shit in her own house. She is a full time servant to her husband's wishes. No one is that deep in a D/S relationship, because it's…

OK sure, but this is a pretty damn clear instance of a good time to include it. Watching these women being grabbed/undressed and smiling through their injuries is extremely difficult.

You are taking a spectacularly smug position that is shockingly lacking in nuance. I am trying to understand whether you really think that survivors have a responsibility to protect themselves from any content including the word rape, or whether you just need to feel good about yourself today. But that's a shitty way…

See also the comments blaming the poster for clicking on the video at all if they're that triggerable. Ironyception

I don't think there's a relationship. Movie adaptations of popular books series have a guaranteed audience. But taking a full year between seasons of a TV show risks loss of viewers. They can have marathons in the months running up to the last batch of episodes to try to get new viewers, but it just seems really risky.
…

Dear lord, it's not simply about the shorts, people. In the same way that the story about the girl whose mother made her stand on a corner with a sign was not simply about twerking. The lesson these parents are teaching their daughters is not that there's some mystical connection between her clothing and her…

The dude named himself CreepyAssCracker so that he could speculate about the actions of a teen who was shot dead, the day that his killer was found not guilty of murder. How is that not trying to provoke a negative reaction just cause?
Here he pops up just to say that people are harassed just need to toughen up. Again,…

I see a lot of people quoting the anger-inducing (and rightfully so!) parts of this, so I just wanted to point out:

I would always prefer consumer action to laws because it's the community taking care of itself. The problem is that so often, the community gives up. We can't report all of them/ The company doesn't care/ Nothing has changed—these are the things that tend to stop the needed momentum. I would consider holding the…

Also, if this dude just doesn't care who's offended, why is his name left out of the story? He hasn't done anything wrong, so why not let us know who this roguish jokester is?

The OP also specified "continued" harassment. It's well known that on sites like Twitter and facebook, harassment is not done via private message. Now I can't speak for the OP, but as someone who also wants to see social media companies stop being safe zones for harassers and bullies, I don't see much point in…

I agree with you, and I'd like to add that the hipster misogyny has been majorly aided by pop culture. Family Guy and The Man Show (off the air for awhile by now, but it made its mark) and other shows with a large audience really mainstreamed "sandwich" humor to the point that currently 13 year old girls will spout it…

Your false analogy is really extremely false. First of all, if I receive a threatening/hateful message in the mail, I can destroy it and no one else will ever see it ever again. If someone starts a hate page about me with pictures and personal information, but they make it look jokey, even if multiple people report…

Could you maybe just be happy in your relationship that works for you without A) assuming you know what motivates 100% of people who are different from you and B) declaring yourself the judge of what is and what is not a selfish relationship?

That really sucks. I am glad to see different relationship styles being discussed more often, and I hope that in the not-too-distant future we'll reach a point where people don't feel that they need to justify their romantic/sexual preferences by denigrating any or all others.
It's especially disappointing behavior…

When people use the phrase "lynch mob" to describe people who want to see zimmerman do jail time, I actually have to stop myself from physically lashing out.

He's basically Scott Peterson, except instead of reporting his wife missing, he invented a black carjacker and shot himself in the gut to back up the story.