The title makes me smh. Some articles should point out race, but this one is not needed. You could just say:

It’s woke-ception. 

You joking? Kids do that all the time and stay with friends. I’ve done it. Rebellious teenage years, better or worse.. My high school girlfriend and I would drive into the woods and sleep there since we couldn’t do that in our houses, and we’d basically rough it for 4 days or something. 17 is the perfect age for that.

What's the problem here? They didn't have stock available for everyone, so they chose a method that rewarded their customers and probably also cut down on scalping. They probably got more consoles in the hands of gamers who actually wanted them than went to people who just want to flip them. 

You can still claim it on the PS site and then maybe, one day when the semiconductors flow again, you’ll get a PS5 and be able to play it.

I just don’t see us getting any ES6 news. Todd has said multiple times we will get Starfall first, so if anything it would be that. I would love to be wrong, but this post seems to know nothing about the situation, it seems you just assume because it’s been three years we are going to get ES6 news LOL

Somewhat ironic considering the driving in the first Watchdogs game was notoriously awful.

It turns Mass Effect 3 into a borderline hack and slash game.

You’re on the brink of death—a tense situation—so the game therefore increases the tension, possibly with the hope that it could stoke some dormant survival instinct. Red screens of almost-death also serve as an immediate visual cue to warn the player about impending death.

Or found by the test department hitting edge cases and it was a simple fix so some dev decided to close the bug to improve some pointless metric to appease the corporate gods.

Learn to read. I didn’t defend it with freedom of speech. I don’t think it should be deplatformed as I don’t believe this is hate speech anymore than any CoD game (it ignores atrocities, it doesn’t celebrate them) but I explicitly stated in the comment you are responding to that it wouldn’t be a violation of the First…

Lol.

I swear, you guys are as dense as FREEDOM OF SPEECH WARRIORS! A store refusing to carry a product that it ordinarily would *because* of that product’s speech is censorship. It isn’t illegal or a violation of the first amendment, but it’s censorship.

It is censorship, who told you it wasn't? 

Nice

Nice

nice

Nice

Nice.