DeathBattleFan123
DeathBattleFan123
DeathBattleFan123

Gotcha... So the other side is wrong so nothing they say should be represented in any way, shape, or form. Perfect logic, chief. Great article.

You'd think that, but it doesn't play out that way. In order to use banelings against marines you've got to get them caught up somewhere, especially when both players are highly skilled. Honestly, the problem is that because marines can shoot and move without needing to finish their attack animation, in the hands of

Kinda one-sided coverage here, don't you think?

No explosions.

People seem to be missing the point here. A Wii Remote is 1 to 1 aiming in FPS games, but that doesn't necessarily make it a better input device than a velocity-based thumbstick controller. Could you get used to using a touchpad-based virtual trackball? Sure, just like I got used to using a Wii Remote for CoD.

I seem to recall a SMT game where the kids kill themselves at the start of each battle so their ghosts can rise up and fight monsters. I'd say that's plenty more disturbing than this.

For me, the worst is playing Scrabble with people who care too much. If you've never played against someone who cared too much, then you're that guy.

Practice only takes you far as your potential allows it to. What that guy just did takes more than practice — it takes talent.

Just more proof that terran is OP. It shouldn't be possible to win against your unit's hard counter, especially when the enemy force is worth over three times the resources as yours, and your force is made up of tier 1 units. It's total bullshit.

No. That's not how they do it. You have no idea what you're talking about.

To everyone claiming they "instantly saw" that both were CG:

Both Rockstar and the White House have a history of releasing products that are completely fuxored. Why would anyone be surprised by this?

Do you know how puppies learn to *not* bite other puppies, dogs, and people? It's an interesting process. In their litter, puppies play with each other, rolling around, tackling one another, and of course biting each other. When one puppy bites *too hard* the other one winces, yelps, and snaps back, usually causing

I think what you're getting confused about is that when you physically discipline your child, you're not doing it in a way that injures the kid. Pain is not the primary response you want to induce — it's shock and fear that you want to induce. Why would you want that? Let's say the kid is playing in the yard and he

If you read that study, it admits that the results are in question.

The first and fourth complaint you listed there represent violations of our basic human rights. The middle two, though, I think most people can agree with.

If they smacked you and you laughed about it, then they weren't doing it right. Nevertheless, I'm glad you turned out well.

Indeed, that's my guess. And I supplied my reasoning as well. So far, all you've supplied in the way of reasoning is you think I'm wrong and I'm a jackass. You need to lighten up, buddy.

Wouldn't it be more like "forward-pedaling" though? Because I never changed my statement. Besides, I don't think I made a mistake. I think my initial impression of his statement was correct, and that he attempted to change his meaning.