If everybody had nukes, then I doubt anyone would be crazy enough to invade, MAD and all...

I guess that's your version of a "sick burn"...? I've read all about that stuff — that's why I'm sick of hearing about it. It's all bullshit. Nothing but QQ. You say I missed "all of the points"? You didn't make any points, like, at all. You literally did nothing but express your confusion over whether NSA…

Since we're going on the scenario showed by the trailer the invading forces have already landed on 'Murican soil, so nuking them would be a pretty straight no-go, considering the extreme collateral damage.

Nukes come form lots more places than silos. There's no way short of magic to disable the US second-strike capabilities that nuclear submarines give us. I know it kinda spoils the fiction, but there's really nothing that a modern-to-near-future-era country could do against a nuclear threat aside from back down.

I think you are the retarded one here. Male protagonists in video games are frequently given features that serve no other purpose than sex appeal. To guys, this makes the male protagonists look tough, strong, maybe suave (depending on the character)... to gals it makes them look hot. There's no difference.

Everybody that has a problem with Quiet's sexy portrayal is dumb and wrong. There's no better way to say it. I wish they would shut up and stop trying to make an issue out of a non-issue.

1) The US was already gone. Everything was destroyed, and armies were invading.

No way. It already showed the entire US in ruins, and the population is being gunned down in the streets. They've got nothing left to lose — the nuclear gloves would come off.

1) I'm not saying that the US would intercept or counter the orbital weapon. I'm saying that whatever army activated the weapon and then invaded would get their countries wiped off the face of the Earth.

The guy in this video is a fuckhead. He clearly doesn't like this genre. That's fine. Play a different one. There's plenty out there.

Yeah, but why exactly does that disable all our nuclear subs that are constantly on patrol out at sea, each with a compliment of nuclear missiles sufficient to glass a few continents? And how does that disable the ICBM program exactly? What about the aircraft carriers? And the nuclear destroyers? These weapons,…

So are they going to explain how America gets invaded when they've got such a massive stockpile of nuclear weapons? I mean seriously, if an invading force were marching on our homeland and slaughtering our people, we'd say, "Guys, y'all got one day to GTFO and surrender, or we're vaporizing your half of the planet." …

It bothers me that people care about this, because they shouldn't.

News from the Not-So-Distant Future:

"Research" can be guided however the researchers want it to be. Data can be skewed. Results can be interpreted however is convenient.

Yeah, but do you think he's any good at the Street Fighter games? I'm gonna blindly bet "no"...

1. On what grounds do you think they'd have a good case against this, given the obvious laws against what they tried?

More backpedaling. You already recognized that the murder affects more than just the person who was killed. As you demonstrated, the surviving sister will be haunted her whole life because of the murder of her sister. But with time, she'll likely get over the rape. I don't know why you're still talking.

If the company felt like fighting this lawsuit, they'd probably win, and you'd be stuck with over 10 grand worth of legal fees. You *MIGHT* win, or they may decide that it's not worth the hassle... but all you'll get is maybe 5-10k, max. It's just not worth it.

No. QA is a full-time position, year-round. And they STILL only make 20-30k anually.