That's a shame. Honestly, I've not heard a single good thing about this game so far. It's not made by Rocksteady, it's not written by Paul Dini, the story sounds like an excuse to put Batman against a slew of villains and nothing else, it's made by an untested studio, whose only credit was a shoddy port of Arkham…

I'm surprised to see you getting so vocal and aggresive in defense of Kotick's pay day, you always seemed a little more fair and level-headed than that.

Well, of course you stand to make more money by making a game multi-platform. That one comes under "common sense 101". Nobody's disputing that. Sadly, for you, we don't live in an ideal world. The only way we'd have no exclusive titles, is if there were just one platformer holder. If that were the case, there'd be no…

It was actually down to 14 or 16 for me, so I won't argue with that one!

Having totally forgotten I'd posted on an article like this, I was thoroughly confused to open my notifications and see a response starting, "I'm a heterosexual girl and I've fallen..." My face, it was really like o.O. I couldn't at all figure out why anyone would be telling me that. xD

It's all been downhill since 2010; as soon as Kinect came about, the 360 was suddenly a media centre first and a games console second. In two and a half years, there's not been a single worthwhile Kinect game for anyone over the age of eight, and there have been very few traditional games that have genuinely been…

Urgh, Rare. Every time someone mentions their name I die a little inside. Under Nintendo's guidance they put out some genre, and even generation-defining titles. But with Microsoft? A couple of easily-forgotten platformers and shallow Kinect games. It's a tragedy.

You know what would be cooler? Being able to play games online with your friends for free, and being able to access a selection of media services for $60 a year.

Well, 14 gets my vote.

Pretty much. Since it's released, Microsoft have failed to prove that it's worthwhile for anything other than dance and fitness games, shallow mini-game collections and exotic animal/theme park simulators for four-year olds. Every attempt that's been made for a hardcore Kinect game has ended in total failure; Star…

Well, it would be a bit strange if you could instantly watch your friends' games live and comment and interact with them, but still weren't able to have cross-game chat, wouldn't it?

I'd highly doubt it. Look at the 360's history; even in its glory years, most of its exclusives were third-party; Gears of War, Mass Effect, Splinter Cell, Dead Rising, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, very few were actually first party, and most of those have gone multi-platform now anyway.

First off, I'd just like to point out that the sales of a game, do not affect one's enjoyment of a game. "Oh, Call of Duty sold 20 million units, so I liked it more than Valkyria Chronicles!" - said no one, ever. I'd rather have a system that see eight great exclusive titles a year, that sell two million each, than…

I can understand in some cases. Microsoft have made a case for that in the last few years, by constantly pushing media features that have no correlation to gaming at all; TV channels, sports streaming, film streaming, music streaming, they've been on such a media push that they've left games on the back seat. So in…

That would mean something, if not for the fact that from 2011 until now, each year the PS3 has had far, far more exclusive games than the 360. This year the 360 has had one, whilst the PS3 will have had at least seven full retail exclusives, and it's been that way ever since 2011. The 360 had a great lineup in 2010,…

Okay, having read some of your other posts, I understand where you're coming from a little better. You're a more single-player adventure kind of guy, right? Not into the "playing/sharing with friends" thing. That's entirely fine, that sounds like me too! Let's put it this way, if Sony put out, let's say Uncharted 4,…

Honestly, read your own comment, there isn't any other way to take that one, buddy. You made a sarcastic dig an an entirely optional social feature, and then went on to say that you'll skip this console generation for a while in favour of PC. There's no other way to interpret that. I'd understand if you'd looked at…

As a 30 year old with a full time job, wife and son, I'd have expected a far more sensible comment from you. "What? There's an optional feature to share things?! Fuck that, I won't have any optional features forced on me, I'll buy a PC instead! Where uh, they also have optional social sharing features..."

I honestly don't think that Sony need to open up new studios to "sustain momentum" at all. They've got more studios under their belt than anyone else, and they consistently task them with "hardcore" output and very little in the way of casual releases. Add to that, that they manage to continue fan-favourite…

Killzone 4 was actually always a known game, we also know that Guerrilla have been working on a second non-Killzone project for a good few years now.