You didn't, but that doesn't seem to be at all related to this. To the point I think you're trying to make though, there are many Jews and Muslims that have been killed by religious extremists (sometimes by Christians), so why are Christians the only ones that get to claim to be persecuted? Additionally, secularists…

I don't know. But I do know that since the first night of protests, volunteers (all of whom are black, or at least all the ones I've seen photographed so far) have guarded shops and stores around town, risking their lives to protect them from looters. You know, doing the job the police should be doing instead of…

I'm sorry, but I cannot take seriously anyone who calls him- or herself a libertarian or an independent anymore. It has reached the point where seemingly anyone who claims to be either of those is only masking very conservative beliefs but cannot stand to be identified with Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh.

He implies that the community only wants to blame a fictitious character, "the man". This implies that there is no true inherent social problem in North American culture. He implies there is no institutionalized racism. He implies that the people are not trying. He's saying all that about an entire community, and…

You do realize that most of the individuals who were arrested for looting were from out of town right? Those are just opportunistic thieves. The protest isn't a homogenous mass.

"To explain what I mean by this, consider the U.S. dollar. It says on it "in God we trust" yet the dollar is not religious."

Anti-religion comments are appropriate when dealing with aggressive, racist, young earth creationists like Kevin Sorbo. The worldview is incorrect entirely, unlike more mainstream Christianity which is at best unfalsifiable.

Forgive me for saying this, but the whole libertarian thing is kind of turning into the new, "I'm a vegan" thing.

Well, you named three very different things. I'm going to go with people are predominantly against the first and the last, thus mitigating the second.

While suspension is clearly an over-reaction, I cannot fully express how annoying it is that every time I sneeze I am forcefully included in a superstitious religious ritual.

So what you're saying is that he went from "virtually identical to everyone's uncle at Thanksgiving" to "exactly identical to everyone's uncle at Thanksgiving"?

You know, from what I've seen, most of them aren't so much "anti-religion" as "anti-shitty religious propaganda movie with a misplaced persecution complex".

You think that's bad, you should see the incredibly ignorant movie he starred in this year, it stars him as a "staunch militant atheist teacher" who is slowly convinced by his students to stop his deviant ways and believe in Jeeeezus.

I for one 100% will support always online

The real problem is people expecting people to be unbiased in the first place. It's not going to happen, ever. Unless there's some sort of yes/no criteria reviewing will never be unbiased, and people need to stop being so passionate about that crap.

Nice joke! But there's a worthy answer for me to give you, because I should point out that if we did a review, Nathan wouldn't be allowed to do it, though I also am sure he'd never ask to.

I think it's ridiculous only because...who cares who someone is having sex with?

The ridiculous pitchfork mob after Zoe Quinn because she made a fucking game that manchildren are crying about is ridiculous. People have doxxed everything they can about her, dug up every past relationship. This is psychotic, it is beyond psychotic.

the console version, like most console versions, is like the pc version, but five times better in every conceivable way #consolegamingmasterrace