I never did build the clear-reveal model of the Wankel rotary engine, yet I’m still fully aware of its mechanical inefficiencies.

That didn’t take long. Already a relentless rotary fan trying to make an argument for their reliability. Who are you trying to convince?

Does it really suck? Look, from a mechanical marvel standpoint, I can appreciate rotary engines. From a fundamental functionality standpoint, they’re terrible.

Don’t forget about all the 18 year old “Ultimate Klasse” Persians.

What did they expect? SUVs aren’t built for the track.

True. Not to mention, “Passenger” by the Deftones... featuring MJK.

TOOL.

Really? Last I checked the 911 weighed in just over 3,000 pounds. Also known as ~500 pounds lighter than an M4.

The shit this publication writes about is bewilderingly stupid.

I’ve driven every M3 and the F8x is my least favorite just behind the E9x.

Don’t forget, it’s still got plenty of power and if you think otherwise you have an unrealistic perception of your driving abilities.

The M4 is atrocious. You have no taste.

That’s my favorite as well. Best BMW art car, bar none.

To be honest, I don’t really see the problem. I mean, he did return the wallet and likely returned the phone in better condition than it would have been if they had continued driving.

Typical Audi owner.

Lived there for three years and dearly miss that place. Criminally underrated by westerners.

What exactly is the point of this article? Yes, Southern California has a warm and dry climate that’s permitted classic cars that weren’t ‘rust-proofed’ to survive. Instead of writing pointless hyperbolic articles, stop being jealous and move to California, dipshit.

Any running vehicle for $3,000 or less, especially ‘80s - ‘90s Hondas, is a damn good deal.

Fuck’em.

Fuck you! You beat me.