Technically, “vintage” is reserved for cars built from 1919 to 1930. However, the terms classic and vintage get tossed around too nonchalantly amounts enthusiasts. It’s a general rule of thumb that anything built after the ‘70s that’s highly desirable/collectible is referred to as “modern classic.” Sorry, a…
Modern classic, sure. Vintage? Hardly.
That’s not vintage, it’s just old.
Money can’t buy ability. Dipshits.
I shot this ‘69 Yenko a couple weeks back for Hagerty. Owner was kind enough to meet me before the sun woke up. (Even better, I got to drive it!)
I feel you, man. My classic dream car has been an Alfa Rome Giulia Sprint GT Veloce since I was 13. In 2005, I had the chance to pick a nice driver for $10k. That same car today is north of 35k and concours examples are fetching double that. I spent months searching for a clean driver in the ~$25k range and every…
“What you think of as a cool vid, cops think of as evidence.”
Unfortunately, it’s not going to burst but rather taper off and plateau. The days of cheap 911 were officially gone forever the minute shitbox 912 started selling for $25k.
At least the longhood is pretty. I don’t get the appeal of the 993 at all. It looks like a a 964 that’s been melted. Rubbish.
Anybody else find this extremely inefficient? Seems like far too much manual labor and time considering how often this needs happen.
***The problem was never Honda, but the owners.***
Except it’s nowhere near as good as a DC2.
Oh no! How unfortunate.
Am I the only one who likes the stripes on the 911R?
Wow, we got ourselves a badass over here.
Not sure what you’re asking exactly?
Not likely.