Dat-Wontfly
Dat_Wontfly
Dat-Wontfly

No, this guy is not right.

The cover where Spider-Man's ass looks similar is not sexual or intending to be sexual, though. Drawing a character with an ass isn't the issue. Even comparing the Spiderwoman cover's artist to his other works, you can find pornographic works of his look identical to the Spiderwoman cover he

They seem trustworthy, I believe them.

I explained in the article what spurred it. Did you miss that or not believe it? There were allegations last week that Sarkeesian lied about informing the police about harassment. A critic of hers had a person from the SFPD on audio saying they hadn't heard from Sarkeesian. That was certainly a story I felt we should

(Meanwhile, at the evil fortress of Game-Hating Feminism)

Totilo: I did just as you commanded, my mistress! I posted the story about the bomb threat on the same day a conservative feminist critic said something else about video games!

Anita: Excellent! With Kotaku under my evil feministy grasp of evil! I can continue

If Steve wanted to be part of the solution he would in fact be calling on other men to stop being assholes. He does not care if they are assholes. He just wants to bash women. C'mon, look at the replies here.

Because, obviously from your response, you are one of these guys who simply refuses to take a woman's word for it. I just read dozens of coherent, rational, logical replies to your question and you decided to dismiss everything everyone said to you and restate your question.

Yes, but they can choose to be civilized and not harass people.

Hideous quality of the sculpt aside, and to some here who crave attention by posting derogatory remarks about the woman, however poorly she lived her life, she was an amazing talent as a songwriter and singer and her brief fame was well-earned.

As someone who was crying herself to sleep at the age of 7 because I realized I'd never be pretty when I grew up - get her into therapy. Not because there is something wrong with her or the way you parent, but because even as well-intentioned as you are (my parents were too! They said the same things you said!) she's

9. No one ever told me how irrationally crushed I would be the first time my little girl wanted to marry the silly, handsome boy from preschool instead of me.

All alone

I'm an Old too, and I don't see this argument. Online shopping presents a risk too, but no one is telling Target hacking victims that they shouldn't have been shopping online in the first place.

There are a lot of very good reasons to not take naked pictures of yourself, but that's kind of beside the point. Despite all these good reasons people still want to do it, and they have a right to do it in the privacy of their own home, and they have a right to expect that their private accounts are not going to be

This is what they call a win-win situation:

I see your eye flick gif and raise you a snake hips:

To the people who object to this: Do you want to take the chance that you are going to have sex with someone who is not 100% consenting? If the answer is in any way "Yes", you need to take a good, long look at yourself.

I was waiting to see who would be the first manchild to go for the oh so original "I JERKED OFF THAT MEANS I WIN, LOL TEARS" response. You have done well to win the Predictable Response Race.

No matter if you think it is a sex crime, they were still criminally obtained. If someone hacked into your online banking and stole your money you wouldn't be quite so blase about it. If someone used your image without your consent for purposes of profiting off of it, you'd probably be pissed. If someone broke into

You know, given your cold lack of compassion for the victims of this violation, your hand-wringing concern over linguistic niceties is a bit fucking rich.