I agree with him. Tolerance can go too far.

“Allow me to say that I appreciate your civility and open-mindedness. I rarely encounter such a person on the internet.”

What would Al Gore think?

“The police deal with every single one of us.”

“I don’t think I know anyone who would attempt to physically wrest a loaded gun from someone unless they were under extreme duress.”

“This is why all police activity must be recorded.”

“There Are No Innocent Black People.”

“I take it you don’t know what civil disobedience is, if you think ISIS and the Nazis are examples of practitioners.”

“Civil disobedience is the only peaceful means by which some people’s voices can be heard.”

“Bottom line, we need cops, we have cops, and the groups trying to destroy the United States from within by promoting civil disobedience will fail.”

“Make a case for what? The existence or nonexistence of a law? Either “obeying police orders” is a ubiquitous law or it isn’t.”

For a more nuanced understanding than “the parties switched platforms,” see some of the responses here: https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-tha…

“Google it.”

“Generally, unless a police officer is ordering you to follow a law, you have no legal obligation to comply.”

“You don’t know what the circumstances were. You’re victim blaming.”

“That depends on your jurisdiction, I believe. Obeying a police officers order is not a federal law.”

“We have cops to uphold the law. Not dole out ass whippings. And yeah, she was rebelling. Or protesting, if you will. Pretty much by definition.”

“That’s the funny thing about conservatives. They want freedom for themselves - that is, total freedom. They want the freedom to oppress anyone, at any time, and not be punished for it. That’s their definition of ‘freedom’.”

“Said law enforcement slammed the disobedient girl to the floor, then tossed her across the room. How about if police officers treated civilly disobedient protesters as such? Are you ok with that?”