Yeah, I’m not really seeing a “solution” here. It seems like the plan is to literally pretend like it never happened.

This is not a CVT.

You have brilliantly missed the point with this reply!

You do realize that even if the insurance pays out the full value of the new Mercedes(they won't), he would still be out all of the taxes and fees right?

LMAO

I’ll be honest. First, I usually despise any and all advice given by that Tavarish guy. But, in this case you are dead wrong. You just come across as being selfish and whiney. There is literally no difference between this and all of the taxis, buses, contractor vans, light rails, and even dedicated rolling billboard…

This is probably the first one of these articles you have written that actually make any sense.

Agreed, I'm 29

Honestly I think Id take the boat on this one.

I don't think that he's referring to the loan. Most of the people that make this comment are referring to the electric vehicle tax breaks that are allotted to the buyers.

Sweet! I promise to use my powers for good!

Can I get back out of the gray too? I don’t know how I got stuck back here to begin with.

Grass fed, don't forget about grass fed!

LOL! So angry! Your 78 fairmont is likely exempt anyway, unless you live in CA. And besides, I'm not really talking about you. You are the minority of a minority. I'm talking about the people with modern cars that have the parts available and still choose to go with cat deletes.

I blame all of the idiots running test pipes or cat-delete pipes on their road cars. If you can't afford to do it right, then don't do it.

It's actually based on the 2500 suburban/Avalanche platform.

At what point was I “hating”? I’m sorry that I was not more specific and mentioned that it was the 2500 version of the suburban/avalanche. I was referring more to the wheelbase than the hardware. Many people think is a Tahoe because of the deceptive proportions, but it is actually much larger.

It’s actually on the Suburban/Avalanche platform

That is an interesting idea. I wonder if he could be charged with destroying government property for that?

That's an interesting idea. I wonder how well it would work in practice