Why don’t you use Google? And there are other stories that say Dave is opposed because the development will not benefit the village. 

The problem with Critical Role’s latest campaign are people like you sniffing for the faintest whiff of manufactured outrage and blowing it completely out of proportion.

But these bad faith takes DO discredit/shame/ruin positive forces of good. The Right just takes great pleasure in exposing this bullshit, and why shouldn’t they?

Expecting better from Kotaku was your big mistake.

Are you role playing as some sort of woke idiot? If so, bravo! Ignoring the entire context oversold it, 8/10 for effort.

It was sadly obvious from the beginning that the campaign was destined to fail

FFS. So nobody deserves any kind of quality if they buy something?

But variolation wasn’t safe, and had a variable and mostly unpredictable success rate.

Stick to game news, politics is not your thing.

Uh, look at the graphs. Colloquially, vaccines “cured” the disease, buddy. 

So what makes these “entitled” fans different from the others this site frequently decries?

If its non-functional then where’s the harm?

This reminds me a little bit of the ridiculous rumors about the “secret sauce” in the Xbox 1.

No a bad review, spoiled by yet more childishly ignorant  opinions.

Too much hyperbole to take seriously.

If it’s a black person life simulator then I’d agree. But I’m guessing it isn’t, it was probably just another lame attempt to garner bullshit praise from bullshit websites like this one so what difference does it actually make?

Who are you trying to impress, You idiot.

And apparently murder is not the worst crime you can commit in game.

Are we going back to claiming that violent video games also promote violence? Because if we’re not, then the claims are absurd.

Jesus Christ, this stretches logic to its breaking point.