Yes: who approved the rear end design? The lights are...not in the right spot.

The solution here is that we need regulations related to bumper height so that taller vehicles don’t override smaller/lower vehicles.

“It would best be suited for someone with mechanical knowledge and skill to tend to its unique performance and needs.”

I wouldn’t be surprised if he bought some kind of insurance policy on this offer. 

Imagine if Thomas saw the pressure building against him and decided to pull the chute and take the offer. Could John Oliver really bankroll this?
I have no idea if he’s earning Jay Leno money, but this would hurt

1998 Ford Sierra RS Cosworth 217bhp 2.0

Everyone tends to think of F50's, Diablos , and Vipers when you say 90's supercar, but I think the Esprit deserves a bit more attention. If it wasn’t for the weakly built transmission this car would have been able to debut with the 500hp it was fully capable and intended to have. Which would have been huge in the mid…

Yes, you could’ve bought a matching trailer when you popped for a Prowler:

The Plymouth Prowler:

I remember when those first gen Sebring convertibles became disposable $2k cars. I’d argue the design on them was all great for what it was - an economic convertible with a usable back seat. The mechanicals were just the usual garbage Chrysler product, so it would have been awful with any body on there. 

Considering it’s a Ferrari, $12,000 for a battery is not that bad. 

More impressed with the documentary-style information he provides about the history of the plant than his stunt or the abandoned plant itself. Not bad.

I really like the Rivian twins. If do ever go electric they would be on my list. If only they would fix the front so it does not look likes it is showing me it’s boogers.

Counterpoint: I love when people upbadge so obnoxiously it’s obvious it’s not true. I put hellcat badges on my Chrysler 200 a while back. Still think its funny. My Transit Connect has SVT Cobra badges all over it

You know what?  It’s not an attractive car.  It looks like a fish.  There, I said it.

But Wes, the AWD on my forester let’s me pull out of that greasy parking lot more quickly so that I can cut off grandma rushing home to feed her cats that fancy new wet food she bought at the grocery store. Without that AWD I would just be spinning my tires!

Can we please stop perpetuating the myth that AWD (as used in economy crossovers) provides any actual function or benefit beyond adding drag, weight, and complication?

These stupid things. I could provide some decent reasons as to why, but whenever I see them, I get irrationally angry.

yeah sure hate on a well-engineered, affordable, practical, relatively efficient yet stylish vehicle.... weirdo 

I don’t really want to kill the 4-series as much as I want to end the naked mole rat front end. The 4 is probably the most egregious in the grill to car ratio and it just needs to stop.