data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c12cb/c12cb865443cac87e708793a386aa3802f85074f" alt=""
Here's a clip.
Here's a clip.
FYI- that may not be real.
Earlier in the year they conducted a handful of real world tests which yielded results that were about 40 percent off what their theoretical models had predicted.
I believe that I read somewhere that it's not even in the ipsw for anything other than the 4S.... So it may be quite a while.....
Well, you wouldn't leave your cellphone in the sun all day; the charger has a battery built in so that you can charge it's internal battery all day, then use that battery at night to charge your phone/MP3 player/other USB charged device at night.
I think KickStarter might have gotten #GizmodOwned
Larger version of the picture.
Quite possibly. This is now the outlook I'll be taking because it's the most positive and realistic one I've heard of. Thank you good Sir/Madam.
I work for the government and I consider myself a good person... I can be snarky at times, but who isn't? If I see someone who needs help, I offer assistance when I can. Sure, sometimes my job requires me to do things I'm not 100% in agreement with, but that can be said of almost any job. It doesn't say anything about…
And no one cares enough about the name to be discouraged from buying/using the product.
As competitive as the news industry is, I feel that if people would respond well to positive newscasts then we would see more of them.
Ratings; not enough people care about all the good that's out there.... They want to see the bad so that they can feel better about their life.
It has a built in battery that is capable of fully charging a cell phone battery. So, unless you park underground/in a garage/under a tent, you should still be good.
What's sad is the priority human behavior receives attention; "Person kills 20 in shooting spree" will always get priority over "child helps 100 elderly citizens cross street". The news focuses on the negative because that's what the populous wants to see....
When we assume someone is bad based on their skin color, it's racist. Why should it be any different when it's based on their uniform? (job-ist?)