DJGHOSH
DJGHOSH
DJGHOSH

I don't think it is overboard at all. I think if enough people take the same path as this gent, then companies would not be so flippant about bullshitting about their products. They either will start becoming honest or find that they actually need to deliver a higher quality product. I usually am not the kind of guy

Still sounds like a terrible reason to preorder. Is one's life so empty that you have to set up your gaming time a whole day in advance?

I did not even know that this game was being developed until i saw this article.... that is how much i care regarding them and their retarded pre order incentives.

I... actually loved this, lol.

I haven't visited Cracked in about a year. This video did not encourage me to go back.

Super Mario Bros. It just drops you straight in ;)

I have the feeling that Square Enix has had a department for the last decade specializing in figuring out what games people don't want, and then greenlighting them.

Boxers or briefs during game testing?

She's so deep.

Though hilarious (when are dick pics not?), an "American Hero"? Really?

I tried to find the humor. But no dice.

But i think that was the excuse to get lazy regarding creativity :)

Cool Gif :) But in agreement with most of the guys here... DS 2 bosses i found where much less interesting than DS 1

New IPs with new characters seems to be anti Nintendo policy.

I think you have given more thought and caring than the entirety of SEGA regarding Sonic. I always thought that his creation was just a case of throwing stuff against a wall till something stuck (which I really think Mario is as well, just a random combination of characteristics). Though I think you've given him too

Only thing I was glad to see was the return of the Mako. But even that vehicle lost its modern 70s Sci Fi charm that the first 2 ME games had. And the armor has that weird, ungainly look that halo 4 had for its updated armor... I'm somewhat sad to see the uniqueness of the original aesthetics gone. Hopefully we can

Oh, i totally agree that i can't make the artstyle be the defining argument factor ;) Just my opinion that i think it makes light of a serious situation. But I agree, i hate to be one of "those" guys, but i doubt that i would pick this up.

Im not doubting that they'll try to treat it seriously, but no matter how good your intention is, it is tough to show both sides of a story when you get your information from one side. I guess if the story was just billed as "US Army's view of the war on terror" then I would have no point to argue, but to say it is

I shit my fucking pants first time i saw that boss.

I'm saying I dont think they spoke to anyone in the region regarding the subject matter. Even in the article, it just mentions that they just spoke to US soldiers regarding their experiences in the war, not the "recipients" of the war. I am not saying that they will be painting them in a bad light, but that is still a