Cuteinexecute
Cuteinexecute
Cuteinexecute

This argument — isn't it all a little too convenient — would only make sense if the accuser came forward "so close to the Heisman trophy ceremony." She went to the police immediately, in December of last year.

You know, I work for Palestinian rights of enfranchisement and reparations, and stupid remarks like yours (to: ThereAreManyLikeItButThis) which are totally unrelated to the topic, do a disservice for those of us committed to human rights in the region. I, myself, was very moved by this documentary. She is no less

One of the Star Wars figures I had as a kid in the eighties was the Rancor Keeper.
I really liked that toy.

I actually thought him dumping the boyardee was the most true act to his character. He didn't see them open the can, didn't see it get into the bowl. In his mind every bowl of food is probably poisoned. Because why would they help him?

"Hey, if I murder someone and they're dead in the legal sense that their heart is no longer beating and their brain function has ceased, but otherwise they're completely fine, is it OK?"

This is a pretty fucking simple question to answer, and it depends on the situation. If one minor is abusing the other, the abuser should be charged and the victim should get the help he/she needs. If it was 'consensual', in the idea that two idiots are doing dangerous things with each other that they don't fully

MRA's generally aren't good at social interaction when it comes to understanding when people don't wanna hear their shit, and take their "no" as an indicator of aggression or stupidity rather than an indicator of their own. Shows why people think so many of them are creepy predators; it's because they have no empathy

"Thought experiment fallacy feminazi logic rational ad hominem red herring TruthwithacapitalT whyarethingsthings WHO WAS PHONE?????"

^ He's one of those recurring trolls who always brings up shit like "what if both parties are drunk, does that mean the man and woman have raped each other?" and "if [X], is it really rape?"

Your first question makes the mistake that if someone over the age of consent has sex with someone under the age of consent, it is by definition not consensual sex, and therefore can be considered rape in the court of public opinion. If they are both underage, I believe that it should be addressed by professionals,

18 is legal, but "consent" under the age of consent is not. That's why it's called "the age of consent" - under that age you're not fully capable of understanding the parameters of consent.

Gaga looks different every time I see her. I'm convinced she's actually an entire improv acting troupe from Peoria.

Soft and gentle. Yes - I am a fabric conditioner.

There, Patterson introduced her to Thor...

The article did not say or even hint that all men were the real enemy; you inferred that for your own reasons. The dismissiveness of your response DOES indicate that you are oversimplifying her argument by claiming that HER argument is oversimplified...a common logical fallacy. Works well for defensive victimization,

That is exactly what was said. Now: explain how you got past all the booby traps Jezebel has set up specifically to keep filthy male swine away!

"Common sense" tends to rest on subjective cultural values and personal experiences as often as not, in my experience (see what I did there?).

Batman dresses as a bat and beats up random crooks in his movies.

My 2 cents on it. While neither is particularly realistic.

Seriously. I speak Labian, which is an outer-precint dialect, but there is also Clitoran, Cervixes, etc. Unfortunately, the subtleties of Vaginese have eluded straight white men for centuries.