Yo, I understand people don't like this celebrity or whatever, but this article reeks of bisexual erasure.

Yes us american do not right gud like you do.

They buy a plot and put the tombstone over an empty grave. Solved.

With the several social loner type teachers my classmates brought to angry trears when I was in high school, I don't think I'd have felt safe knowing they were armed.

No way. Intersectionality rules. It's just that jez writers seem to be totally unaware of it. Their sex writer didn't know what cisgendered meant.

Not a vegan. Love vegan food. Just imagine all the weddings vegans go to where they can't eat anything. Turning this into some kind of eyeroll situation just means you're an asshole that can't stand being in someone else's shoes for five minutes. Except you can actually eat vegan food. Fuck off Tracie.

If something like that enrages you then what the Fuck are you doing on a feminist website?

What a dick. Private booths are for phone charging and sandwich eating.

It's brain wiring. They've been able to fuck up people taking tests with moral questions with focused magnetic fields. It stands to reason that some people are likethat by default .

It's spelled 'wack'

Marginalizing transgender issues doesn't make for funny satire, it perpetuates cissexism.

And you'll find no support from the transgendered community with your airy dismissal of their oppression. The language is very necessary to talk about their day to day lives and the cissexism they experience.

Because there are people whose gender aligns with their sex? Or do you think it doesn't need a word because its 'normal' and everyone else can be 'other'

noooope. anyone with the glaring knowledge and judgement gaps she's displayed should not be given a paid platform on which to give advice (especially since I think she's encouraged to rile people up for clicks)

You are cisgendered that is correct. but Lunchcoma was referring to this as an example of the marginalization of trans* individuals. If the author was joking, the joke was that cis people are so dominant that we don't even have to know gender terminology. If the author was not joking and seriously didn't know what…

I have a dream that someday people will be judged not for the content of their character, but how much of a blast they are at parties.

she noted it in an incredibly marginalizing way if that was her intent.

Cisgendered people aren't marginalized.

really? I find that hard to believe, what do most people think it means?