So, you're comparing the trailer for an unreleased game to the final product for ONE game, and suddenly decide the Wii U is a worse console?

The Wii U IS more powerful than both the 360 and the PS3 (around 25% faster than a 360) and it has a single core architecture unlike the three cored 360 or the cell processor.

Wow. I live 5 miles away from work and I take my bike 3 or 4 times a week.

The guy was running for his life, got shot, creates another character, and lives again. This is funny because people aren't just straight up killing in a game about straight up killing. They're trying to get more out of the experience, both the killers and the killed.

In the game, no one actually gets hurt.

Nice and dicks. Those are a bunch of lost sales.

I get why, since most games nowadays (specially AAA releases) run on Windows, but I think that's exactly what Newell doesn't want happening anymore.

Now I don't exactly think it was the right time to do this launch, since not even Valve itself releases its games at the same time in both OSs, but then again, when would…

More like Nikos' guilty delirious conscience.

The message is clear: Franchise, either you do well or you end up as a whore

They're great when you have people over.

It was a console RTS done right.

The PC version can get a better framerate if you have the hardware to pull it off.

Have you actually played it? Because I have... I own it, and it's awesome.

Welcome to the era of HD development and bloated production costs.

It's not that companies like playing it safe, it's that most of the time they have no choice.

Fine. It's not like I wanted to touch you anyway!

I thought you meant that a console would become self aware and start killing people and adding their limbs to itself but then fail to take over the world.

You should've placed some angry eyes on the tomato too.

I think the whole point was to make them different and stand out.

Who would be posting in kotaku about those?