ConvictedSpooner
ConvictedSpooner
ConvictedSpooner

Assuming that accidents occur more often when there is a speed disparity between vehicles than when there is not a speed disparity between vehicles, the person going a different speed than the rest of the pack - whether justified by laws or not, will be in more accidents. There isn't much of an argument to be made

Pattern recognition

Why would you believe that?

Cute.

Do what? You were going to argue with me?

Wow, no. Apple is trendy, but by no means a beacon of 'perfection'. (For the record, NO ONE is.)

Hey Lifehacker, how about giving some charts showing what all these people have in common. Gather some standard metrics like "average hour to bed" "computer make", "phone make" , "introvert" etc. It'd be interesting to see this sort of stuff in dynamic graphs and charts.

Elope next time! (har har)

It's easy to imagine the waiters as the middlemen, but really it's the paying customer who is caught in the middle of the employee and the employer's (and legislation too) business.

The amount of separation between the noise of a screaming baby and the noise of a photography critic is disturbingly small to a layman like me!

Motivation for doing things we'd claim as "moral and ethical" can be the result of all sorts of different things. Religion is just one reason. Fear of law is another. Desire for acceptance (for example, traditions) is another. Exhibiting different types of favourable (moral) behaviour for sexual selection is

Extremism is just a term that we throw around when we don't agree with someone else's behaviour in some sort of context. My extremist might be your conservative when it comes to this-or-that. People dragging their family to church on a Sunday morning is extreme if you think about it from a lazy introverted

...Unless of course a person subscribes to one of the other many religions with a purpose not at all similar to what you described.

Yeah! The argument for tipping used to be that it motivated people to give good service. We all know now that's not a significant motivator, yet the notion of tipping not only remains but has become the primary method of compensation.

Use paragraphs every few sentences when you start on a different topic. Subjecting your reader to a huge wall of text doesn't make them want to read your reply no matter how thoughtful it is.

The point is that the customer should not be the one in charge of paying the server's wages. However a server makes money should never be the customer's concern.

Well at least the burden of directly determining wages would no longer be the responsibility of the customer.

It's easy to say "If you don't like tipping, don't go out for supper," since we can easily see how that'll impact the wait staff who will be working for nothing if people DO go out and not tip.

Well said.

How about the place that employs people pays their own employees instead of everyone else?