CommonSense11
CommonSense
CommonSense11

Oh snap!

Ha ha, we’ve had two in a row, but different authors.

I think that’s a fair take.

Yes, that would be the very interesting Jalop article to read. Not this stupid “they contradicted themselves , ha ha” crap.

Agreed. Seriously, I’m really hoping we aren’t on a trend of Jalop articles making fun of authorities when they get very specific on making rulings. Fine, keep the stupid click-bait titles, but this is just as bad as Andrew’s article saying that circuit court in Michigan was saying that forgetting to put the bolts

I feel like it’s deceptive to claim that your vehicle is repaired and now safe to drive when it clearly isn’t safe, as evident by the injuries sustained due to the vehicle not actually being repaired.

my chop (supply officer on the sub) announced “the water is cold today” every damn time he went to the bathroom for a pee.

@Dr. Kamiya - thanks for fighting the good fight on this and sticking with logic. Sorry you have to put up with a bunch of knee jerk reactions from folks that haven’t read the underlying documents and are just reacting to Aaron’s incorrect (albeit entertaining) framing.

I think this is very logical, but completely illogical to common sense.

This.

And by writing this up the way Aaron did, he’s triggered a bunch of idiots in the comments below taking as he has presented, that somehow the judges can’t define ‘perform’ according to our colloquial expectations (mixing up a process from an outcome - they did perform a tire rotation, they just performed it poorly

Yeah, no, that’s not really what is going on here. The court is basically saying that if you did steps 1-14 of your list, you have ‘performed’ the tire rotation. Nothing unfair or deceptive. Now if you forget to do step 12 for one of the wheels, that is by all means ‘negligent’ (and they will get compensation for

Agreed.  I really like the look of this car, but the triangle lights are unnecessary and ugly.

It should destroy the Tesla in every measurable metric based on how much more it costs.”

I disagree with your premise.

Repeatedly telling people that you are smart is prima facie proof that you are not.

You’re getting all mixed up.

I’m not talking about Gran Turismo levels of tire squeal. I guess you are telling me that the professional drivers setting all those manufacturer’s lap times at the N*ring are just doing it wrong?

Porsche has always been a price elasticity test. But to be fair, there is a big, very noticeable difference between a 3.8 sec 0-60 and a sub 3 sec, 0-60.