Commenter7777777
Commenter7777777
Commenter7777777

You must be the same person that’s talked about his “great” 56% true shooting % with at least 3 different burner accounts on this article. It doesn’t matter how many times you spam it, 56% TS is not very good. It’s extremely average.

That is not elite true shooting %. In 2018 his TS% was 136th of players with at least 50 games played.

Didn’t realize until now that annual salaries were commonly over $30 million. Michael Jordan’s $33 million salary in 1998 was finally just surpassed, like, last year.

What he cannot do is be better than replacement level, since 2014.

Wolves only weight ~100 pounds. A 100 pound apex predator can easily fuck up a human. We have far worse muscle mass for our size than any other large mammal.

I’m guessing the Yanny part is in a high frequency above a certain age’s ability to hear. That’s why pitching it up, turning bass knob up/down, or isolating frequencies wouldn’t do any good to let you hear the “Yanny” part. You’d have to actually pitch it down with an audio editor, and then maybe isolate frequencies

Weird not to credit the actress who played Tully (Mackenzie Davis).

He’s got more WAR through his age-27 season than Derek Jeter did.

They should start being addressed as “1963 National Champion Loyola”

The sex offender registry is a civil liberties violation, and its this guy’s only stance that I agree with (although he and I probably have different reasons for that stance).

My completely uneducated & unproven line philosophy is that having a star O-lineman is not as important as having at least average quality across all 5 line positions. Basically, the “chain is only as strong as its weakest link” strategy.

For what?

It’s infuriating for speed runners only. For regular gameplay it’s fine, and therefore doesn’t belong in the same category as those other notably difficult levels.

Sammy Sosa’s & Mark McGwire’s JAWS numbers are both below-average for Hall of Famers. Electing them to the hall would actually lower the Hall’s current statistical standards. There’s a lot of competition among OF and 1B that hit a lot of home runs.

No way that water is close to boiling if he’s holding it with his bare hands in a metal bowl.

If I don’t warm my car up a little bit, my breath fogs up the windshield and makes for unsafe driving.

Love the argument that advanced stats are bogus because of some detail the writer doesn’t like, and they admire traditional stats instead. So they pick a old stat with say, ~30% predictive power (of that player’s contribution to wins) instead of an advanced stat with ~80% predictive power because it’s not close enough

Rich people get a huge tax cut. All that money going into rich people’s pockets is going to come out of medicaid, medicare, SNAP, infrastructure, clean energy, etc.

The randomness is objective. Your declaration of “far less” is subjective. Others might look at the randomness numerical difference and call it “slightly less”.

Sure, but “far less” is a subjective valuation. They’re all still much more random, over small sample sizes, than most other competitions. The reason you “don’t want to break it down for me” is because you can’t. You don’t have the numbers to do so. I’m sure some statistics analysts have though.