Except in the case of the 401k, it’s the regulators scamming the game. *cough*cough* congress.
Comma8
Comma8
You can fire them and in many cases you are legally mandated to do so - the transportation industry for instance; you must legally offer contact information for treatment programs but the DOT mandates that you test and fire people with drinking or drug problems.
You mean that the people who invented an industry wholly based on a legal loophole aren’t running a fair game? /shocking
Every day, 6,686 people die in America from causes other than gun violence.
Not saying it’s preferable but it certainly seems possible.
Seems like 1) shouldn’t be much of a problem if we can make a movie that transforms human beings into believable talking apes through the wonders of modern fx.
Spot on, concern troll.
Major Harris? That’s a deep cut.
Michigan law says essentially “when you engage in any activity involving horses even as background scenery, the horses have the right to injure you or kill you for any reason whatsoever without creating legal liability for their owners. Because, Horses.”
Conversely, prove that the damage happened in the parking lot instead of at the meter up the street. If the attendant marks no damage, then he’s making an affirmative statement that the car was intact while under the care of the parking lot.
Good luck getting a copy.
Everyone in Green Bay knows that Rodger’s achilles heel is his height. A couple times folks have said “you’re not as tall as I thought you’d be” while meeting him and the guy almost breaks down sobbing.
Not picking a fight - just languishing in grey commentor purgatory with the rest of you thinking “this seems worthy ....”
Says the man in grey.
Scott Boras has a job: maximize the future earnings potential of Matt Harvey.
A fine? I’m sure you meant to write “a tax deductible donation to a recognized non-profit charitible organization.”
Just about any event or concert in America allows will call drop offs.
Corporations are people too — actually more “people” than actual people.
It’s really not that odd with a case like this. Probably took time to get evidence back from crime labs, collect evidence, conduct interviews, legal wrangling, etc. The delay doesn’t mean the prosecution is indecisive or uncommitted. It just means there’s a process involved - sometimes a drawn out process.
Yes.