I believe you have that backwards. Those states you listed are states that do NOT have the public policy exception. Most states do have that exception, but those are treated as exceptions to a general policy of “at-will” employment. There is no state where you can fire someone for any reason, with no exception.

Which 8 states are you referring to?

Every state in the US has at-will employment, although some states recognize more exemptions than others and some limited circumstance implied contracts. Also, some non-union government employees are exceptions to this rule. The only time your employment is not “at-will” is if you are working under a contract,…

Unfortunately, you don’t have to justify a firing in the U.S. because every state has at-will employment. Legally, you can fire someone because they had a sandwich for lunch. It’s up to the fired person to show that they were fired for their race, or that they were fired for being part of another protected class.

Even a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, the universe could not find a single fuck to give about fairness.

Yeah, you really need your flannel sheets between you and the denim blanket to make that situation work.

He’s Canadian. Give him a shot of Maple Syrup, some Crown Royal, and a denim blanket and he’ll be fine in the morning.

The article actually says you should use either Yukon golds OR russets, but not reds.

You won’t get enough credit for this, but this is good. This is very good.

It’s only roughing if he didn’t contact the ball before running into the kicker. Once you touch the ball, you can completely destroy the kicker, and it’s legal. Watch the video again, and you’ll see he contacts the ball.

What a scorching hawt taek there, Lindsey.

You can’t just use your eyes to judge this; you have to use your ears. Plays are live until the whistle blows, and the whistle doesn’t blow until AFTER Sherman makes contact with the kicker. If Sherman had decided to pull up after realizing he’s offsides and Buffalo makes…

Yeah, great, except that doesn’t make sense. There’s no “process” to shutting a play down. The whistle is blown and the play is over. The officials didn’t blow the whistle until after Sherman hit the kicker, therefore, the play was still in process. Watch the video link, and you will hear no whistles until after…

No, that actually has nothing to do with the argument. The requirement is that you contact the ball before you hit the kicker, which Sherman did. He reached down and blocked the ball before he hit the kicker. Watch the video.

Sorry there, bud, but reality doesn’t match your narrative. Sherman didn’t get penalized for roughing the kicker because the officials didn’t blow the whistle until after he hit the kicker and got a hand on the ball. He was offsides, for sure, but there’s no roughing the kicker penalty because he contacted the ball…

It walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...

It’s still a shitshow, though!

Honest Question: How much can those medical records be used to defend someone outside of court? Plaintiff alleges X occured, but plaintiff’s medical records don’t back that up. Can the defendant then take those records public to show that these accusations really didn’t hold water?

What I’m trying to get at here is if…

This. This is why.

That’s some solid technique right there. You go, Kelly.

The article isn’t saying that women in leadership positions rose from 23% to 24%. It’s saying that women in leadership positions increased, and that the total increase was somewhere between 23% and 24%. It’s unclear writing.