Is it supposed to rhyme with Enron?

Sonya was the one who made new human growth hormone batches using their kitchen-science lab back in season one, because Travis needs injections of it to live.

I *think* Kellog joined Liber8 to get revenge for his sister's death, and his sister was a member of Liber8.

Probably the gradual decline of the Borg on Voyager...while prequel-Anakin Skywalker wasn't that great, admittedly it was a prequel meant to show him before he was powerful, so it may be unfair to count; even so, while I kind of actually enjoy Hayden, Jake Lloyd was pure cardboard, I mean such utterly bad acting that…

Aragorn and Arwen are dark-haired, as was Luthien before them. For that matter, most of the Gondorians as they are described in the books *are not* blonde haired at all. The Rohirrim are intentionally supposed to be Anglo-Saxon, so they are blonde.

Three points:

Dude...Lena Headey is busy being one of the starring cast members on one of the most critically acclaimed TV shows airing these days, Game of Thrones.

Thrawn, or if unavailable, Gilad Pellaeon - showing that 1 - there's an Imperial Remnant of die-hard loyalists, and 2- surprisingly, many of them are just normal fleet officers trying to do a job, who honestly believe in the security the Empire provided - and who never had a hand in all of that "Sith" stuff.

Those weren't damned monkeys they were actors in suits.

Stop using photos from the Dune movie when the Dune miniseries was both closer to the book and more recent.

A bear there was! A bear! A bear!

Yes, even GRRM himself said Smaug would bet Balerion, because Westeros' dragons are not sentient, they're just animals, while Tolkien's dragons *are* intelligent and can talk, and thus would have a massive advantage in strategy.

Cronenberg's "The Fly" was such a perfect film that, while the general concept might be revisited, nothing can be "improved"

2010 was a better movie, more coherent, and closer to the book.

I'm on the fence about "John Carpenter's The Thing" - it was itself an adaptation of a novella, but the entire thing is a note-perfect classic (ironically, it was also released in 1982 opposite Blade Runner and both got crushed by ET at the box office).

The overall *concept* on the other hand, is general enough that…

This doesn't even sound like...normal foul-mouthed internet posting. They seem to have some specific local slang terms they use a lot ("Trou" is an example, but "tight" is used in all sorts of contexts in this e-mail, stuff like that.

Possibly; they said in the books that the Northern army was going back North, but the Riverlands have several thousand soldiers - 20,000 or more? Well they took losses, but still.

Blade Runner. It can have "sequels" and such, but even the visuals of the original hold up well today. You just can't remake it, at least not a straight up "remake".

Fairly certain a Faceless Man will throw him off the bridge, hopefully Jaqen; but I understand your point; it was ambiguous in the books, while the TV show would visually confirm what happened.

People will "look for him" at Riverrun because he still has a loyal Tully garrison of several hundred soldiers there. OF COURSE he's heading back there.