Sorry, I loved him until I found out he was communicating all creepy-like with teenagers. Ethics fail.

Does it seem entirely coincidental to you that rich people are able to "absorb" much more during their their educations than poor people? Do you think it's because rich people are just more absorbent or because their educations are more easily absorbed?

I don't respond to Craigslist ads unless they have proper grammar and spelling, too. But don't kid yourself that it's not about class. Access to learning about proper grammar and spelling is almost entirely based on class. Unless you're foreign, of course.

This is why my sex life is so good. I have enormously high self esteem—I border on smug and arrogant, really—and my partner is so empathetic that he's like a Star Trek character. Or that one guy on Heroes, who was an empath hero, but I only watched the first season so I don't know if he turned into a bad guy, so my…

"I could never enjoy it because all I'm thinking about is her hating it."

Or, alternately, realizing on Sunday night that you have to go to the emergency room because of your raging UTI.

If hating blow jobs is selfish, then I'm...um, very selfish? I guess? I don't give blow jobs unless I'm in a very particular mood—it's really rare, especially now that I'm an old lady—and that's not a problem. The obsession with blow jobs is a recent phenomenon that as far as I can tell is largely cultural. (Obviously…

Sometimes, it would be worse. Like he could beat her and possibly kill her instead of "just" raping her, or he could decide that he didn't like her uppity, smart-mouth attitude, all telling-him-what-to-do-and-shit, and then use that as his legitimation for rape.

Who the fuck cares whether being gay is a choice or not? It's a stupid argument.

Stop being so thoughtful on the internet. You're confusing everybody.

I totally understand what this article was trying to do, but I also see how the author failed horribly.

"Your music taught me to look past what a person is on the outside, and look for the value within."

I would say that a person can't act like a sex object, they can only be objectified by others. Whether they're doing some internal objectification is entirely debatable, but I don't think that shit can be made apparent to outsiders.

But she was asked about the singers and their relationship to gay empowerment. I mean, pointing out that they don't wear pants seemed less about how they are sluts and more about how wearing pants is a lesbian thing to do. And I mean, it's obviously not, but I think she was aiming at pointing out how being entirely…

OH MY GOD. That first clip is one of the most painful things ever. Watching her lay out intelligent argument after intelligent argument, only to see him manipulate her and also be unbelievably stupid. This is when you realize that IQ and EQ are not the same—she is clearly smart, but (probably because she's 17 and…

So do you think she's lying about being coerced?

Everyone I know who was bullied when they were young has expressed—repeatedly—feelings of revulsion at the thought that their kid might one day be a bully. I know people who have said that they'd rather have their kids go through what they went through then put someone else through what they went through.

"Killing your own meat, or at least knowing where that killing is "locally sourced," seems less about getting closer to your food than getting closer to feeling like a member of a more savage ruling class from history."

It's like the War of 1812 all up in here!

How is he not in jail?