To quote the great Gregory House, "People don't change"

As I said to another repliee, I'm speaking in hyperbole. I'm not that nearly that disgusting but I am generally more laid back about how clean the place is versus my wife. My wife and I dated for 3 years before getting married and her place was always cleaner than mine.

I'm obviously utilizing hyperbole to prove a point. I'm not that disgusting and many of my friends made fun of me in college for putting up drapes and fancy artwork in my college apartment. My point was, as a sex, men are typically more laid back about cleanliness. Be it social conditioning or genetics, it's…

But the door swings both ways, get it? Why should men sacrifice everything they are for their gal? It seems you want your cake and eat it too...

This thing reads like it was written by a 1950's British woman high on gin and tonic. It's an op-ed puff piece meant to rile the feminists, into what I don't know.

Complete and utter crap. This is entirely about not doing things the "right way." Fact of the matter is guys quite honestly don't care. We really don't. We don't care if the dishes are perfectly clean. We don't care if a hotdog falls out of the trashbag and lands in the garage on the way to the trashbin. We don't…

Ahh, self-deprecation, it has worked on my wife for 7 years. I "screw up" and the fallout is much less if I come down on myself hard. "Ahhh, I'm such an idiot", "How could I do that?" etc. etc.

My point? The same as yours, trying to contribute to a conversion.

First off, not a girl.

A little copy paste action from my previous reply:

Thanks for all of the dumbass replies about syphillis/ghonnerea (insert any other STD.) I know this complicated logic I'm using is tough, but perhaps people weren't aware of the machinations of STDs the same way they weren't fully aware of the workings of pregnancy? For heavens sake, syphillis takes years to kill…

Or you could read the first sentence in the third paragraph:

Well there's the obvious biological fact that until the past 50 years men had no real side effect from having sex as much as they wanted. 200 years ago would you WANT to hook up with a guy on the first "date" (if that notion even existed) when you had no clue whether you would get pregnant?

They did say Spanish speaking countries. Maybe the same treatment wasn't applied to Portugese speaking countries. It's the big difference between Brazil and the rest of Central and South America.

Is it possible to give you a million thumbs up? @Jonas, you're an idiot.

Let's be fair here, what do you want him to say? "RIM is dying, I'm just getting my few million before it craps out."? Come on, don't be a douche. This is coming from a 5 year iPhone owner who's always thought Blackberry's were POS, but get real, it's called a job and he's doing it.

Ummm, that's not 16x9, that's 3x2.... still not Apple's MO though.

Contrary to your pseudo self-loathing opinion of America, the vast majority of humanity is gullible enough to believe anything provided it comes from a source they trust, which brings us full circle back to the OP.

I'm not sure how to take your comment. Are you implying that somehow the rest of the world is more or less gullible than Americans. I would assert that it's neither. Everyone is equally stupid.

Never mind they covered the program with disclaimers that none of it was real. Never mind that 3/4 of the "real footage" was obviously fake. Could it be that the vast majority of humanity is just that gullible?