ChrisCroy
Chris Croy
ChrisCroy

Are your magical 100%-working synthetic organs being suppressed by the AMA, the Vanderbilts, organ donors, or a more shadowy organization?

His widely-read fear-mongering piece in the WSJ, in which he spoke of a dark conspiracy of doctors to murder you and harvest your organs in exchange for giant santa-sacks of cash if you make the horrible mistake of signing your organ donor card, received a very short and to the point letter to the editor rebutting his

I thought so too, so I looked into it a few months back. A survey people in the EU found that opposition "animal cloning" was rooted in opposition to genetically modified foods. Apparently, most of those opposed to animal cloning think animal cloning = genetically modification. I suspect most of those opposed to it

The more charitable interpretation is that they regard it as morally unacceptable but still believe it should be legal because of some more important belief. Example: For quite a while, there was a 40/60 split for/against gay marriage. But if you asked Americans if they thought there should be a constitutional

The 2010 version of this poll included a breakdown by gender. Surprisingly, women were less likely to regard abortion as morally acceptable than men. The starkest divide between and women in their survey concerned animal rights. 73% of men and 48% of women regard buying and wearing fur as morally acceptable, 43% & 19%

@Temperance Your reading comprehension skills leave much to be desired. The bill does not protect a doctor from liability for an intentional act or an intentional omission or a grossly negligent act or a grossly negligent omission. That is what "intentional or grossly negligent act or omission" means in English.

@KeYizhen: The bill forbids deliberate lying whether by omission or commission. The only people the bill protects from civil liability are doctors who accidentally do/don't say/do things that result in a child being born unless they were being grossly negligent. While I disagree with the bill as-written, I disagree

Is it too much to ask for anyone complaining about a law to actually link to the law in question? It took me quite a while to find the bill in question. Here's what it actually says:

The New York Daily news left out an incredibly important detail. His problem with the guy wasn't that he was a sex offender, it's that he was black.

There's no provision there for legally growing weed, so all of the coffee shops are actually buying it off of the black market. It's a very surreal situation.

Jezebel already covered the (terrible) study in question in a much more detailed post four days ago. It was posted on 4/20 at 4:20 so I'm not surprised that it's been forgotten.

The author makes some good points, but a few pieces of his evidence ring hollow.

Legally, this story is barely about consent. If you read the indictment, you'll notice the charges are almost exclusively related to pimping with a gun and drug charge thrown in there for variety. They could all be guilty of every charge in the indictment without having ever laid a hand on her and only two of them

Whether she consented or not is mostly legally irrelevant in this case. Go read the indictment for yourself. Just read the first few pages of what they're being charged with, don't get bogged down in the sensationalized details of what was done to her. A pimp who owned a gun, drove a girl to a different state for

@CynicalPink: What are you talking about? Hollow point rounds are completely appropriate for home defense. Half the point of using hollow point rounds is that they are less likely to overpenetrate and kill people you can't see.

@Triphena: It's just a bad sentence. The author's trying to make two points: First, most men are not rapists. Second, to drive home what "5.8 rapes per rapist" means: The 76 repeat offenders in the sample were responsible for over 400 rapes. #rape

@Triphena: It's just a bad sentence. The author's trying to make two points: First, most men are not rapists. Second, to drive home what "5.8 rapes per rapist" means: The 76 repeat offenders in the sample were responsible for over 400 rapes. #rape

@GlinCastleGirl: The overwhelming majority of the time when someone shows up to the hospital with a burn, the honest answer to the question "How did this happen?" is more likely to be "I'm an idiot who managed to spill boiling oil on my leg trying to fry a corn dog" than "My husband poured boiling oil on my leg to

@PrisonBreakShaker: This blog post may be very relevant to your interests. I cannot tell you anything more except you should read her past posts about Eli Roth.